Opinion

Sultan v. Business Bureau

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Nov 30, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Ricardo M. Urbina
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.5%

The opinion

1111111111111.1111181111111

r

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOV 3 0 20C9

Clerk, u.s. District and

Bankruptcy Courts

ANOKI PINON SULTAN,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 09 2273

BUSINESS BUREAU,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs application to proceed in

forma pauperis and pro se complaint. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant the

application and will dismiss the complaint.

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro

se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by

lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must

comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

-1-

3

.

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

As drafted, the Count cannot discern plaintiffs claim or claims. Amidst the pleading's

many biblical references, the Court cannot discern plaintiffs claim or claims against the named

defendant. In addition, the complaint neither states a basis for this Court's jurisdiction nor

includes a short and plain statement showing her entitlement to relief. For these reasons, the

complaint will be dismissed for its failure to comply with Rule 8(a). An Order consistent with

this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

rf±~.~

United States District Judge

-2-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.