Case law

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Trade Exchange Network Ltd.

159 F. Supp. 3d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2015

Cobell v. … See Brown v. Pro Football, 889 F.Supp. 905 , 913 (D.D.C.1993) (“A Michelangelo should not charge Sistine Chapel rates for painting a fanner’s barn.” (quoting Ursic v. Bethlehem Mines, 719 F.2d 670, 677 (3d Cir.1983))).

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Seal & Co.

842 F. Supp. 586 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 1994

Rassoulpour v. WMATA, 826 F.2d 98, 100 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Londono v. Washington Metro. Area Trans. Authority, 766 F.2d 569, 571 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Bell v. … See Bell v. May Department Stores Co., 866 F.2d 452, 455 (D.C.Cir. 1989).

Smith v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

FILED UNITED sTATEs Dlsrnic"r coURT stem FAR _3 _l 29" <»~ ) Julia V. Smith, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. … Brown v. Callfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a resident of Wayne, Maine, sues the United States and what is presumed to be the District of Columbia.

American Viscose Corp. v. Coe

106 F.2d 849 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1939

This ruling was affirmed by the Board of Appeals in respect of the new matter and of the estoppel but not. in respect of indefiniteness, the Board holding that the offered claims 10'.and 11 sufficiently corrected the indefiniteness … Pont de Nemours &, Co. v. Coe, 1937; 67 App.D.C. 42 , 89 F.2d 679 , International Cellucotton Products Co. v.

Flaherty v. Pritzker

322 F.R.D. 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2017

Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 910 F. Supp. 1138, 1157 (E.D. … See, e.g., Anglers Conservation Network v. Pritzker, 70 F. Supp. 3d 427, 437 (D.D.C. 2014); J. H. Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 910 F. Supp. 1138, 1159 (E.D. Va. 1995).

Saunders v. George Washington University

768 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 1991

EEOC v. Brown & Root, Inc., 688 F.2d 338, 340-41 (5th Cir.1982) (discriminatory discharge). … See, e.g., Banerjee v. Board of Trustees of Smith College, 648 F.2d 61, 62 (1st Cir.1981) (requiring a professor denied a tenured position only to show that such positions were available).

Miller v. U.S. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2023

Brown v. … See Shoshone– Bannock Tribes v. Reno, 56 F.3d 1476, 1480 (D.C. Cir. 1995); see also Cox v. Sec'y of Labor, 739 F. Supp. 28, 30 (D.D.C. 1990) (citing cases).

Garner v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 1, 2013

S(a); see Ashcrofi v. lqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califario, 75 F.R.D. 497, 493 (D.D.c. 1977).

United States v. Mangia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Watt

517 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1981

Hannifin v. Morton, 444 F.2d 200, 202 (10th Cir. 1971); Safarik v. Udall, 304 F.2d 944, 950 (D.C.Cir.1962). … See Safarik v. Udall, supra, 304 F.2d at 249-50 .

Ballard v. Disbrow

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). i. … (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); citing Brown v. Sec’y of the U.S. Army, 859 F. App’x 901, 901 (11th Cir. 2021) (per curiam)).

Boyd v. Quigg

698 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1988

of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) of the PTO. … Zenith Radio Corp. v. Ladd, 310 F.2d 859, 862 (D.C.Cir.1962).

Wellington v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 2013

Applying “the 1987 Board guidelines for D.C. … Romano v.

Miller v. U.S. Department of Education

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2023

Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); see also Sargeant v. Dixon, 130 F.3d 1067, 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Sibley v. Obama, 866 F. Supp. 2d 17, 22 (D.D.C. 2012). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Court will grant the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice.

In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg Litigation

585 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v.

Haugh v. McCorkle

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2011

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff purports to bring a civil action against the federal government "for the death of [her] son [who] was shot on the streets of Washington D.C." Compl. at l.

Garner v. Rice

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Trazell I v. Espinto LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2015

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralskjy v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (DC. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, has submitted a “Civil Complaint in Chancery” against a business in the District of Columbia.

Snarr v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2020

But that is not 8 enough.”); Brown v. EPA, 384 F. … And the plaintiff, who had sued on behalf of the Pension Fund in his capacity as a member of its board of trustees, amended his complaint to add the other members of the board as co-plaintiffs – not to substitute the plaintiffs

Colvin v. Tunnage

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2025

See Brown v. District of Columbia, No. 23-7129, 2024 WL 1693616, at *1 (D.C. Cir. … George v. US Bank, No. 24-cv-1598, 2025 WL 973495, at *2 (D.D.C.