Opinion

Haugh v. McCorkle

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Sep 15, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge James E. Boasberg
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.4%

The opinion

FILED

SEP 1 5 2011

F§LT¥§ES§§£§'C’§S§§‘€§L‘§§§F§§ w»~<, u.s. 5a

Courts for the Diszric; of g’;;'d‘r;]tbia

SHIRLEY HAUGH, )

Plaintiff, §

v. § Civil Action No. ‘(4

WILLIAM McCORKLE, et al., §

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the

complaint.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,

must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff purports to bring a civil action against the federal government "for the death of

[her] son [who] was shot on the streets of Washington D.C." Compl. at l. She neither identifies

the named defendants nor supplies addresses for them. Wholly absent from the pleading are any

factual allegations to support her claim, and without additional information the defendants do not

have fair notice of the claims asserted or the relief demanded. The complaint fails to comply

with Rule S(a) and it will be dismissed.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

449

`edSae /i rid u e

DATE_ 7//]/)‘

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.