Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Mills v. Reitman

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 2022

    Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977) (Sirica, J.). … Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 498; Jarrell, 656 F. Supp. 239; Jiggetts, 319 F.R.D. at 413.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hurley v. Heilig

    28 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 1998

    Both plaintiffs and defendants are members of the board of trustees of the Confederate Memorial Association, Inc. (CMA). … Plaintiffs were among the majority of board members who voted to approve the sale of the property. Defendants were among the minority of board members who voted not to approve the sale of the property.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg Litigation

    585 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2008

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security

    811 F. Supp. 2d 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2011

    See, e.g., Brown v. … Similarly, in Brown v.

    Cited 82 timesPublished
  • Cosby v. Dc Housing Authority

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2011

    See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calz:fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). lt appears that there is a dispute between plaintiff and her landlord regarding the payment of rent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boomer Development, LLC v. National Association of Home Builders of the United States

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2019

    Throughout the show, the program was touted by various prominent NAHB representatives, including Rick Judson, Chairman of NAHB’s Board of Directors, and Thomas Vetter, a member of NAHB’s Executive Board. Id. ¶¶ 14–15. … See, e.g., Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blackman v. District of Columbia

    328 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2004

    See Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Cody v. Hillard, 304 F.3d at 773 (quoting Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. at 605 , 121 S.Ct. 1835 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Heisig v. Secretary of the Army

    554 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1982

    Carter v. Seamans, 411 F.2d 767, 777 (5th Cir.1969); Larsen v. Hoffman, 444 F.Supp. 245, 251 (D.D.C.1977). … DeCicco v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • ['Semiani v. Usa-Us Government']

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2014

    S(a); see Ashcrofl v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Cl`ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calg`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a resident of Algeria suing the United States.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Healthalliance Hospitals, Inc. v. Price

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2018

    See also 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 (establishing the Administrator’s authority to “review any decision of the Board”). … DATE: October 26, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge 6

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gail C. Sweeney Estate Marital Trust v. United States Treasury Department

    68 F. Supp. 3d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2014

    Pension Plan & Trust v. United States, 194 F.3d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 1999); Delta Savings Bank v. … of Sonoma v. FHFA, 710 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 2013); see also Leon Cnty. v. FHFA, 700 F.3d 1273, 1279 (11th Cir. 2012); Town of Babylon v. FHFA, 669 F.3d 221, 228 (2d Cir. 2012); La. Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Luevano v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2009

    Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is an inmate at the county jail in EI Paso, Texas.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wright v. Community Bridges

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2013

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges that Ariel Skalina caused her "trauma" because he "objectified" her and "looked [her] up and down like a piece of meat." Compl. at l.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. District of Columbia

    283 F.R.D. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2012

    v. … See Landrigan v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Earman v. Sauf Haus Bier Hall-Pgs, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 2021

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 552 (2007). … See Parker v. Nat’l Corp. for Hous. P’ships, 697 F. Supp. 5, 7 (D.D.C. 1988); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • County Council of Sumter County, SC v. United States

    596 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1984

    McCain v. Lybrand, 104 S.Ct. at 1044 . 2. In Blanding v. … In McCain v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Smith

    729 F. Supp. 1380 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 1990

    See, e.g., Haiti v. United States, 260 F.2d 744, 746 (9th Cir.1958), cited in United States v. Brown, 688 F.2d 596, 598 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Essex, 407 F.2d 214, 218 (6th Cir.1969). … Id. at 959 (emphasis in original), quoted in Brown, 688 F.2d at 598 . Finally, United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harris v. US State Military

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2011

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges that she has been "threaten[ed] and assau1t[ed] by P.G. Police office[rs,] . . . hazed by U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2018

    Taylor v. Solis, 571 F.3d 1313, 1319 (D.C. … See, e.g., Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F. Supp. 2d 1, 9 (D.D.C. 2011). 17 or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(a)(1).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. American Foreign Service Ass'n

    846 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 12, 1993

    See Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 109 S.Ct. 1775 , 104 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989); National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp., 462 U.S. 393 , 103 S.Ct. 2469 , 76 L.Ed.2d 667 (1983). … V.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.