Opinion

Wright v. Community Bridges

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
May 10, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.3%

The opinion

wl

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY 1 0 2013

C*€rk, u.s. msu-icc and

Ba"kruptcy courts

CASSEY WRIGHT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action N0. .

) 15/677

COMMUNITY BRIDGES, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff’ s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the

complaint.

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,

must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff alleges that Ariel Skalina caused her "trauma" because he "objectified" her and

"looked [her] up and down like a piece of meat." Compl. at l. Plaintiff does not explain Mr.

Skalina’s relationship to the named defendant; nor does she set forth sufficient factual allegations

to support her claim that the defendant’s actions "violat[ed] the Disability Act." Ia'. Plaintiff

thus fails to provide either a short and plain statement of the claim showing that she is entitled to

relief or a statement showing the basis of this court’s jurisdiction As drafted, the complaint fails

to comply with Rule S(a), and it will be dismissed. An Order consistent with this Memorandum

,i…tz>c_

United Stat:s‘ District Judge

Opinion is issued separately.

DATE:

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.