Case law

Haight v. O'Bannon

102 F. Supp. 3d 179 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2015

Brown v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 79 (D.D.C. 2009) (quoting 3 Price v. District of Columbia, 545 F. … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1021 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (citing Sledge v. District of Columbia, 869 F.Supp.2d 140, 145 (D.D.C. 2012)). 4 U.S. 115, 124 (1992)).

Salleh v. Christopher

876 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 1995

with the statute,” NLRB v. … Celotex v.

Lane v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2014

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Stated briefly, the complaint is unintelligible. The Court cannot identify the particular wrongs the United States allegedly has committed. … Cqfield v. Williams, No. 96-5072, 1997 WL 68271, at *1 (DD. Cir.

Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calij"c`zno, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

Neal v. Kane

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2012

NEAL, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 1 2 THOMAS R. … Brown v. Calz'fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a prisoner who currently is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional institution in Terre Haute, Indiana.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Operative Plasters' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, Afl-Cio

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2010

Deklewa v. … Areas Pension Fund v.

Long v. McFarland

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2010

LONG, Plaintiff, civil A¢ri@n No. w ~ (§Z)@ V. PATRICK E. McFARLAND, \/£££\_/&/\J§\} Defendant. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff’ s complaints fail to comply with the minimal requirements of Rule 8(a).

Vote Forward v. Dejoy

District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 2021

ballots to the local boards. … Holmes v. FEC, 71 F.

Riethmiller v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2012

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. lqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

540 F. Supp. 2d 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2008

See Cobell v. … Serv., Inc. v.

Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States

35 F. Supp. 3d 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2014

United States v. … See Beazer E., Inc. v.

Lopez v. Rodriquez

500 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1980

Marshall v. … Brennan v.

Deglaire v. French State

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2026

See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). They also assist the court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter. … See Opati v. Republic of Sudan, 140 S.

De Pusana v. United States

164 F. Supp. 672 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1958

This was in accordance with the almost unanimous view, until the recent case of Soriano v. … The Government relies upon Neely v. U. S., 4 Cir., 1940, 115 F.2d 448 and Simmons v. United States, 4 Cir., 1940, 111 F.2d 618 . But these cases specifically reject the language of the Kosario decision.

Selden v. Bennett

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2011

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Cz'ralslcy v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Callfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a Florida prisoner confined in Daytona Beach, Florida.

Grant v. Department of Treasury

272 F. Supp. 3d 182 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2017

Id.; see also Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 589 F.3d 445, 447 (D.C. … Grant v.

Graham v. Lavoy

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2012

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff purports to be a resident ofNew York, New York.

MARIRIO v. Dickinson

56 F. Supp. 2d 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1999

See Boyden v. Commissioner of Patents, 441 F.2d at 1043 . Before plaintiff may appeal either to the Board or to this Court, he first must provide the PTO with a complete patent application and be denied a patent. … See 35 U.S.C. § 145 ; see also Boyden v. Commissioner of Patents, 441 F.2d at 1043 ; DeSeversky v. Brenner, 424 F.2d 857, 859 (D.C.Cir.1969).

Julius v. Bank of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2011

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Evenpro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff mentions the name of the defendant, see Compl. ~ 1, and appears to list account transactions, see id.

Garrow v. Phillips

664 F. Supp. 2 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 1987

In support of this claim, plaintiff relies upon the Supreme Court’s opinion in Cleveland Board of Education v. … To the contrary, the Loudermill Court reaffirmed the decision in Board of Regents v.