Case law

Long v. Oposch

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues an individual located in Alexandria, Virginia.

Perea v. Supreme Court of California

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Landmark Legal Foundation v. Internal Revenue Service

87 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2000

This circuit rejected a similar argument in Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. … a privacy interest in “avoidance of possible harassment of [the board’s critics] by the Board or others with whom they work and associate.” 33 In support of its apprehension, the commission noted that the board’s president

Jennings v. Shultz

355 F. Supp. 1198 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 1973

Unemployment Comm’n v. Aragon, 329 U.S. 143, 153 , 67 S.Ct. 245 , 91 L.Ed. 136 (1946), Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965), Udall v. … See Jennings v. Connally, 347 F.Supp. 409, 411, n. 6 .

Johnson v. District of Columbia

49 F. Supp. 3d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2014

Faragher v. … But Johnson's only relevant factual allegations are that she, unlike her white co-workers, was compelled to come before a Trial Board for making false statements, and that she was later fired on the Trial Board's recommendation

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Feffer

795 F. Supp. 1223 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1992

See CFTC v. Harker, 615 F.Supp. 420, 426 (D.D.C.1985); RTC v. American Casualty Co., 787 F.Supp. 5 (D.D.C.1992); RTC v. McCamish, Ingram, Martin and Brown, Misc. No. 92-152 (D.D.C. May 21, 1992).

Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Carvino

654 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 1987

As stated in Clark v. … See also White House Vigil for ERA Committee v. Watt, 717 F.2d 568 (D.C.Cir.1983); United States v.

United States v. Neill

964 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 1997

United States v. Butler, 924 F.2d 1124, 1127 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 871 , 112 S.Ct. 205 , 116 L.Ed.2d 164 (1991); see United States v. … Brown, 16 F.3d at 428 ; United States v. Brooks, 957 F.2d 1138 , 1145 n. 7 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1228 , 112 S.Ct. 3051 , 120 L.Ed.2d 917 (1992).

Kenney v. Swift Trans, Incorporated

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2012

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The "Draft Complaint," replete with typographical errors and sentence fragments, mentions an arbitration proceeding.

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

266 F. Supp. 3d 297 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2017

Second, apart from the alleged violations of the advisory board members’ Constitutional privacy rights—the existence of which the Court assumes for purposes of its standing analysis, see Parker v. … D.C. v.

Tiburicio v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2011

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). I \~ I  --- ... _.._-----_............. _--_.

Burley v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2011

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Ambellu v. Re'ese Adbarat Debre Selam Kidist Mariam, the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewhado Religion Church

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2019

Under D.C. law, a board of trustees may owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty to the corporation and its members. See, e.g., Willens v. 2720 Wis. Ave. Co-op. … See, e.g., Moore v.

Qualls v. Rumsfeld

357 F. Supp. 2d 274 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2005

Cinciarelli v. Carter, 662 F.2d 73, 78 (D.C.Cir.1981); Woodrick v. Hungerford, 800 F.2d 1413, 1416 (5th Cir.1986); Pence v. Brown, 627 F.2d 872, 874 (8th Cir.1980); Castle v. … Caldera, 74 F.Supp.2d 4, 8-9 (D.D.C.1999) (citing numerous cases); Brown v.

Stewart v. Gaines

370 F. Supp. 2d 293 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2005

He must, instead, have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it. *296 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 83 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Parole Board to consider in making set-off decisions “cannot be construed to give rise to a liberty interest”); see also Brandon v.

Day v. D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

191 F. Supp. 2d 154 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2002

See Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498 (D.C.Cir.1984) (en banc). … See Brown, 742 F.2d at 1500 n. 2, 1509-10. C.

Doe v. American University

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2020

Richter, 2019 WL 481643, at *2 (quoting Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014)); see also Tsintolas Realty Co. v. Mendez, 984 A.2d 181, 187 (D.C. 2009). … Doe’s only qualm is that the Appellate Board failed to provide a “meaningful explanation.” Compl. ¶ 288. His theory of breach, unlike in Doe v.

Monbo v. U.S. Department of Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2025

Appeals (the “Board”). … Count Thirteen seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Navy to comply with the Board’s ruling. Id. at 31–32.

Burley v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2011

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff, a resident of Kingston, New York, sues the United States, President Barack Obama "and administration," and the State of New York.

Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2013

See United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 285 F.R.D. 133, 134 (D.D.C. 2012). … Barko v.