Opinion

Burley v. United States Government

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jun 15, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Richard J. Leon
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.4%

The opinion

,

FILED

JUN 1 5 '011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the Olstr,ct of (;olumbia

Toni Patricia Irons Burley, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

Civil Action No.

11 1091.

United States Government et aI., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

complaints to contain "( 1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355

F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff, a resident of Kingston, New York, sues the United States, President Barack

Obama "and administration," and the State of New York. She seeks $60 million "and property

and land back." Compl. at 3. In the complaint, plaintiff mentions fraud, bribery, conspiracy, and

constitutional violations, but she states no coherent facts to provide any notice of a claim. A

separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date June' ~

t{J

uni~'

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.