Case law

Blackman v. District of Columbia

328 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2004

See Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Cody v. Hillard, 304 F.3d at 773 (quoting Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. at 605 , 121 S.Ct. 1835 ).

Doe v. American University

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2020

Richter, 2019 WL 481643, at *2 (quoting Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014)); see also Tsintolas Realty Co. v. Mendez, 984 A.2d 181, 187 (D.C. 2009). … Doe’s only qualm is that the Appellate Board failed to provide a “meaningful explanation.” Compl. ¶ 288. His theory of breach, unlike in Doe v.

Smith v. Harvey

541 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2008

Although Smith was given notice that she was being considered for involuntary separation and was given the option of appearing before a separation board (see id. at 5), she has declined to appear before the separation board … See Wilhelm v. Caldera, 90 F.Supp.2d 3, 8-9 (D.D.C.2000) (citing Guerra v.

B & G INVESTMENT PARTNERS LP CORP. v. Thompson

391 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2005

The Court finds that the Board’s consideration and interpretation of the Prospectus is reasonable and supported by the record. See Consolo v. Fed. Mar. … See, e.g., DSE, Inc. v.

Michelin v. Jenkins

704 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 1989

Further, the Board of Education is not a legal entity, and therefore it is not subject to suit. Miller v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 106 F.Supp. 988, 989 (D.D.C.1952). III. … Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim is governed by Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968) and its progeny.

Julius v. Social Security Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2009

DISTRICT COURT TYRONE JULIUS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Montgomery v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

601 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2009

See Holt v. … Cohen v.

Berry v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2018

BERRY, Plaintiff, v. … See, e.g., Saint-Fleur v. McHugh, 4 83 F. Supp. 3d 149, 157 (D.D.C. 2015).

Washington Hospital Center v. Heckler

581 F. Supp. 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 5, 1984

No. 83-2341 had claimed entitlement to a return on equity and, in a paper filed with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the Board) in 1982, relied on the 2% allowance as an alternative method for computing the amount … Joseph Hospital v. Heckler, 570 F.Supp. at 439 (discussing Schweiker v.

Ward v. Vogel

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2014

See Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991) (“Personal-capacity suits . . . seek to impose individual liability upon a government officer for actions taken under color of state law.”); Brown v. Wilhelm, 819 F. … Pollard v. District of Columbia, 285 F.R.D. 125, 127 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Mann v. Castiel, 729 F. Supp. 2d 191, 196 (D.D.C. 2010)).

Blackman v. District of Columbia

277 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2003

See Schneider v. … Industry Association v.

Newcomer v. Corporate America

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2012

S(a); see Ashcrofl v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (20()9); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 20()4). … v.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Operative Plasters' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, Afl-Cio

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2010

Deklewa v. … Areas Pension Fund v.

Smith v. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2014

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. l937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a resident of Lakewood, Colorado, suing the United States for monetary damages. See Compl. at 2, 9.

McKeeman v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing the United States.

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission

893 F. Supp. 2d 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2012

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge; WILKINS, District Judge; and BOASBERG, District Judge. … Ass’n v. Fed.

Grant v. Department of Treasury

272 F. Supp. 3d 182 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2017

Id.; see also Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 589 F.3d 445, 447 (D.C. … Grant v.

Woodward v. Moore

451 F. Supp. 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 1978

Abruzzo v. United States, 513 F.2d 608 (Ct.C1.1975); Denton v. United States, 204 Ct.Cl. 188 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 963 , 95 S.Ct. 1949 , 44 L.Ed.2d 449 (1975); Mercereau v. United States, 155 Ct.Cl. 157 (1961). … See Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975); Knehans v. Callaway, 403 F.Supp. 290 (D.D.C.1975); see also Kennedy v.

Advertisers Distribution Services v. United States Postal Service

526 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 1981

Plaintiffs have failed to meet the requirements for granting injunctive relief under Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. … The Board of Governors’ action complied with the notice provision set forth in 39 U.S.C. § 3641 (a).

Kirkhuff v. Cleland

516 F. Supp. 351 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 1981

Board, since the Board had no jurisdiction to consider that evidence. … by plaintiff before the Board.