Opinion

Smith v. Department of Justice

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Oct 8, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.3%

The opinion

f/v)

FILED

0CT - 8 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT C|ark, U.S. D|strlct & Bankruptcy

F@R THE DISTRICT QF C()LUMB}A Courts for the Dlstr|ct of columbia

Matthew Alan Smith, )

Plaintiff, §

v. § Civil Action No. !$l*' z

The Department of Justice, g

Defendant. §

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis The Court will grant the in forma pauperis

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Pro se litigants must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

complaints to contain "(l) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."

Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. l937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355

F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff is a resident of Lakewood, Colorado, suing the United States for monetary

damages. See Compl. at 2, 9. In what is probably the most coherent sentence in the prolix

complaint, plaintiff states that he "was not granted a simple change of judge or venue," which "is

disturbing and improper when procedures get out of hand especially when the plaintiff obviously

wins summary judgment in some instances." Id. at 2. Plaintiff seeks to reopen cases that seem

to have no connection to this judicial district and over which this Court would have no

jurisdiction. See id. at 5 & Attachment. Regardless, the complaint fails to provide any notice of

a discernible claim. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

,A ~A<MB(@S~

3 United States\District Judge

Date: October , 2014

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.