Case law

Colbert v. Turri

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2010

Greene v. Dalton, 164 F.3d 671, 675 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Harding v. Gray, 9 F.3d 150, 154 (D.C. Cir. 1993). … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

Mitchell v. DCX, Inc.

274 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2003

See Brown v. … Brown, 782 A.2d at 760 n. 11.

Moore v. U.S. Justice Department

District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 2014

S(a); see Ashcrofr v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)', Cira[sky v. CIA, 355 F.Bd 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Caftfctno, 75 F.R.D. 497,493(1).:).€. 1977). The plaintiff, a resident of Jacl<son, Mississippi. purports to sue the United States Department of Justice. See Compl. Caption.

United States v. Scurry

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2018

Information obtained from the Savoy taps implicated co- defendant James Brown, and the FBI obtained authorization to tap Brown’s cell phone from September 13, 2010 to October 12, 2010. … See U.S. v. Dewalt, 92 F.3d 1209, 1212 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v.

United States v. Chandler

744 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1990

At this point Detectives Oxendine and Beard re-boarded and walked back to the defendant. … See United States v. Alston, 742 F.Supp. 13 (D.D.C.1990) (this Court’s opinion); United States v. Mark, 742 F.Supp. 17 (D.D.C.1990) (this Court’s opinion); United States v.

Kiviranta v. Brownell

141 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1956

and thus did not “knowingly and intentionally waive his rights to citizenship”, as required by Moser v. … United States v. Bazan, D.C.Cir., 1955, 228 F.2d 455, 456 . See also Petition of Ajlouny, D.C.E.D.Mich.1948, 77 F.Supp. 327 ; Petition of Caputo, D.C.E.D.N.Y. 1954, 118 F.Supp. 870 .

Hudson v. Spencer

335 F. Supp. 3d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2018

Mesnick v. Gen. Elec. Co. , 950 F.2d 816 , 822 (1st Cir. 1991) (quoting Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. , 895 F.2d 46 , 50 (1st Cir. 1990) ). … . *200 O'Connor v. Steeves , 994 F.2d 905 , 907 (1st Cir. 1993).

Grigsby v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2025

Dickson v. … Circuit has emphasized that military boards like the ABCMR receive the benefit of an “unusually deferential application of the arbitrary or capricious standard.” Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C.

Shipman v. Disabled American Veterans

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2015

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 US. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (BBC. 1977).

Humane Society of the United States v. Perdue

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2018

Humane Soc’y v. Vilsack , 19 F. … Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 317 (1988).

Gilbert v. Napolitano

958 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2013

s SGI, Ex. 2. 8 Nor does this case present "the highly unusual circumstances" that led the court in Brown v. … The procedural history of this case pales in comparison to Brown. Compare Gilbert v. Napolitano, 670 F .3d at 259-60, with Brown, 777 F .2d at 9-11.

Spine v. Biedermann Motech Gmbh

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2010

Estee Lauder Inc. v. L’Oreal, S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1997). “Questions of law are reviewed de novo, but the underlying factual determinations made by the Board are reviewed for clear error.” … An action brought under § 146 is essentially a proceeding to review the action of the Board. Conservolite, Inc. v. Widmayer, 21 F.3d 1098, 1102 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

McLane v. Salazar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2021

In May 2013, Judge Wilkins remanded McLane’s Title V claim to the Board and stayed McLane’s Title VII and Rehabilitation Act claims while the remand was pending. Id. at 1-2. … Because the full Board never passed on the merits of McLane’s claims, the AJ’s November 4, 2016 initial decision forms the basis of the Court’s review. This review is “deferential[],” Fogg v.

United States v. Sears

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2020

See Coleman v. United States, No. 4:17-CR-69, 2020 WL 3039123, at *5 (E.D. Va. … Date: June 16, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson u KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District

Julius v. McKinnon

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2010

BankruptcY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the District of Columbia TYRONE JULIUS, Plaintiff, ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff alleges that the name on his SmarTrip card, apparently issued by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, is not his name.

Rushing v. America

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2021

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Plaintiff alleges that he forwarded a complaint and lawsuit to then-President Donald Trump, but that no rebuttal was offered. Compl. at 1.

Bullard v. the United States Patent and Trademark Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2009

And "[ a]n applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ... … Leighton v. Cae, 130 F.2d 841, 842 (D.C. Cir. 1942); see Field v.

D'amore v. Small Business Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2024

TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 423 (2021); see also Lujan v. … See, e.g., Laufer v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. One or More Unknown Traders in the Common Stock of Certain Issuers

530 F. Supp. 2d 192 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Smith v. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2014

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. l937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a resident of Lakewood, Colorado, suing the United States for monetary damages. See Compl. at 2, 9.