Case law

Wagner v. United States Solicitor General

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  As drafted, plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a).

Rushing v. State of Michigan

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2021

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678- 79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Pappas v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2026

.: 19-2800 (RC) v. … Hopkins makes no argument regarding the adequacy of the representation he is receiving as a class member from class counsel, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC and Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP. See NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v.

Venditto v. Cunningham

322 F. Supp. 3d 254 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2018

Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc. , 754 F.Supp.2d 128 , 159 (D. … Laverty v. Massad , 661 F.Supp.2d 55 , 62 (D. Mass. 2009) ; cf. Butler v. Winner Int'l Corp. , 1995 WL 420004 , *4 (4th Cir.

West v. King

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2024

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

United States v. Thomas

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 2023

See id. § 3142(e)(3)(A); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021) (RCL). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 170; cf also United States v. Bethea, 763 F. Supp. 2d 50, 54 (D.D.C. 2011) (RCL) (narcotics trafficking generally).

Rodearmel v. Clinton

666 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2009

Rodearmel relies on Board of Education v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 , 88 S.Ct. 1923 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1968), and Clarke v. … There can be no doubt that [the school board members] thus have a “personal stake in the outcome” of this litigation. Id. at 241 n. 5, 88 S.Ct. 1923 (quoting Baker v.

Adams v. District of Columbia

740 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2010

Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)). B.

United States v. Chandler

744 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1990

At this point Detectives Oxendine and Beard re-boarded and walked back to the defendant. … See United States v. Alston, 742 F.Supp. 13 (D.D.C.1990) (this Court’s opinion); United States v. Mark, 742 F.Supp. 17 (D.D.C.1990) (this Court’s opinion); United States v.

Gullaksen v. United Air Lines

68 F. Supp. 3d 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2014

Gullaksen sought to appeal to a panel of arbitrators known as the System Board of Adjustment (“System Board”). Id. ¶ 23. He requested that ALPA submit his appeal, but ALPA declined. Id. ¶¶ 23-24, 41. … .”); Linke v.

['Patrick-Bey v. U.S. Government']

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2014

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). Plaintiff, a resident of Arlington, Virginia, sues the "U.S. Government," but he has made no factual allegations against the United States.

Rhem v. United States of USA

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2016

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Court has reviewed the complaint and finds that it is incomprehensible. … See FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475 (1994).

B.R. Ex Rel. Rempson v. District of Columbia

524 F. Supp. 2d 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2007

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Pacific Ranger, LLC v. Pritzker

211 F. Supp. 3d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2016

United States v. … DATE: September 30, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Calhoun v. Doan

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2009

E.g., Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 458.

Spine v. Biedermann Motech Gmbh

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2010

Estee Lauder Inc. v. L’Oreal, S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1997). “Questions of law are reviewed de novo, but the underlying factual determinations made by the Board are reviewed for clear error.” … An action brought under § 146 is essentially a proceeding to review the action of the Board. Conservolite, Inc. v. Widmayer, 21 F.3d 1098, 1102 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Baumann v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2011

See Duvall v. … Elkins v. District of Columbia, 636 F. Supp. 2d 29, 33 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285 (D.C. Cir. 2008)).

Robertson v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2026

In Brown v. District of Columbia (“Brown v. D.C.”), 928 F.3d 1070 (D.C. Cir. 2019), the D.C. … Shook v. Board of County Commissioners of County of El Paso, 543 F.3d at 604.

Lake v. Cameron

267 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 1967

The Circuit Court, in Lake v. … V 1966), which became effective January 1, 1966. The Circuit Court granted a rehearing en banc, and in a five to four opinion, Lake v.

Bogus v. Stackley

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2019

for Correction of Naval Records (“BCNR” or “Board”). … Piersall v. Winter, 507 F.