Case law

Wagner v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

United States v. Ramirez

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2024

See id. § 3142(e)(3)(A); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021) (RCL). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 168–69. Given the evidence to date, this factor weighs in favor of detention. See United States v. Brockhoff, 590 F.

Berg v. Commissioner

33 F.2d 641 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

W. 958 ; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , 142 N. W. 129 , and State v. Royal Mineral Ass’n, 132 Minn. 232 , 156 N. W. 128 , Ann. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed, with costs.

Scott v. Office of Alexander

522 F. Supp. 2d 262 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2007

See Browning v. Clerk, United States House of Representatives, 789 F.2d 923, 931 (D.C.Cir.1986). The D.C. Circuit expressly rejected the Browning precedent in Fields . 459 F.3d at Ills. … See United States v.

Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. Middle States Ass'n of Colleges & Secondary Schools, Inc.

302 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 1969

Justice Brandéis established the following guidelines in Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. … Justice Brandéis in Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. United States, supra, the exclusionary criterion must be viewed in the light of defendant’s objectives.

John L. Doyne Hospital v. Johnson

603 F. Supp. 2d 172 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2009

On July 9, 2007, the CMS Administrator issued a notice declining to review the Board’s decision, and hence, the Board decision became the Secretary’s final decision. AR 1. … Joseph’s Hosp. v.

Moore v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2014

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2()09); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … v.

Blanco v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2023

Supp. 3d 115, 124 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Kreis v. Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1989)). “A court will disturb only the military board’s ‘most egregious’ decisions.” Id. … “[T]he function of [the court] is not to serve as a super correction board that reweighs the evidence.” Poole v. Harvey, 571 F. Supp. 2d 120, 124 (D.D.C. 2008) (quoting Epstein v. Geren, 539 F.

Johnson v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.

903 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 1995

After further review and approval of the MSEC’S actions by both the Hospital Board of Directors and the Board’s Quality Assurance Committee, the Board of Directors convened to render a final decision regarding Dr. … A licensing board, by its very existence, has complete control over access the regulated professional job market. Despite this control, such boards have been routinely held not to be employers. See, e.g., Haddock v.

Hargrove v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

116 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 1953

Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239, 244 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 ; Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Ry. Co., 339 U.S. 255 , 70 S.Ct. 585 , 94 L.Ed. 811 . … Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 .

Laster v. District of Columbia

439 F. Supp. 2d 93 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2006

Op. at 7 (citing Spilsbury v. Dist. of Columbia, 307 F.Supp.2d 22, 26 ). 9 . A second role of the school board is to fund a child’s education. Fagan v. … Parents may act unilaterally when the school board does not comply with IDEA provisions. Block v.

Duggar v. Thomas

550 F. Supp. 498 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1982

Board of Trustees v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 296 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). … Foremost, among others, Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); Furnco Construction Corp. v.

Lucas v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2023

Office of Personnel) on March 7, 2007; to the District of Columbia Retirement Board on March 26, 2010; to the Police and Firefighters Retirement and Relief Board on May 13, 2010; and to the MPD on May 13, 2010.” Pl. … Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 918 F.2d 214, 216 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(1)). The Back Pay Act is “an auxiliary measure that operates only at the relief stage.” Brown, 918 F.2d at 217.

Bryant v. Leavitt

475 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2007

Teneyck v. Omni Shoreham Hotel, 365 F.3d 1139, 1149 (D.C.Cir.2004). See Lathram v. Snow, 336 F.3d 1085 , 1088 (D.C.Cir.2003); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … See Burton v. Batista, 339 F.Supp.2d 97, 110-11 (D.D.C.2004) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 ; Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 819 (D.C.Cir.2001)); cf. Weigert v.

United States v. Blue

874 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 1995

Pinaud v. … United States v.

West v. King

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2024

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Ballard v. Polly

387 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1975

Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U.S. 411 , 54 S.Ct. 487 , 78 L.Ed. 882 (1933). Defendant cites Whitfield v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 43 So.2d 47 (La.App., 1949) and Ford v. … Board of Education, 16 N.Y.2d 302 , 266 N.Y.S.2d 364 , 213 N.E.2d 667 (1965); Cioffi v. Board of Education, 27 A.D.2d 826 , 278 N.Y.S.2d 249 (App.Div.,1967); Luna v.

Hamilton v. Rhee

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. Dist. of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 3 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

Thompson v. Young

63 F. Supp. 890 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 1945

This application was denied by the defendants, who compose the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and thereupon the plaintiffs brought this suit. … Talbott v. Independent School District, 230 Iowa 949 , 299 N.W. 556 , 137 A.L.R. 234 ; Dismuke v. United States, 297 U.S. 167 , 56 S.Ct. 400 , 80 L.Ed. 561 .

Frederick v. Small Claims District Courthouse

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The instant Complaint does not provide the Defendants or the Court with adequate notice of a claim.