Case law

United States v. Carter

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2020

The government’s attempt to analogize this case to United States v. Brown, 334 F.3d 1161 (D.C. Cir. 2003), is also unpersuasive. … Brown, 334 F.3d at 1162. But Brown had a number of facts, absent here, that render the case distinguishable. First, the officers in Brown were responding to a 911 call with many specific details.

Covenant Health System v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2011

Ctr. v. … See Banner Health v.

Parra v. Judicial Conference of the United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Additionally, “[e]ach allegation must be simple, concise, and direct.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1). … Dozier v. Ford Motor Co., 702 F.2d 1189, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 1983); see Sun v. D.C. Gov’t, 133 F.

American Train Dispatchers Ass'n v. Burlington Northern Railroad

784 F. Supp. 899 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 1992

Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 93 , 99 S.Ct. 399, 401-02 , 58 L.Ed.2d 354 (1978) (limited jurisdiction over decisions of Adjustment Board); United Steelworkers v. … V. Conclusion This issue should be finally decided by the National Mediation Board.

Strang v. Collyer

710 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1989

The Work Product Exemption In National Labor Relations Board v. … In FTC v.

Johnson v. United States Federal Government

District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2025

. § 8347(b), and any adverse decisions must first be appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”), id. § 8347(d)(1). … Brown v. Marsh, 77 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985).4 Exhaustion under Title VII and the ADEA is “non-jurisdictional,” so a plaintiff need not plead it. Bain, 648 F. Supp. 3d at 46 (citing Bowden v.

Hargrove v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

116 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 1953

Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239, 244 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 ; Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Ry. Co., 339 U.S. 255 , 70 S.Ct. 585 , 94 L.Ed. 811 . … Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 .

West v. King

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2024

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Estevan v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2023

The Review Board score is particularly important. … Ryan v. Reno, 168 F.3d 520, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1999); see also Tex. Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v.

Wagner v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Ballard v. Polly

387 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1975

Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U.S. 411 , 54 S.Ct. 487 , 78 L.Ed. 882 (1933). Defendant cites Whitfield v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 43 So.2d 47 (La.App., 1949) and Ford v. … Board of Education, 16 N.Y.2d 302 , 266 N.Y.S.2d 364 , 213 N.E.2d 667 (1965); Cioffi v. Board of Education, 27 A.D.2d 826 , 278 N.Y.S.2d 249 (App.Div.,1967); Luna v.

In re Zuckert

28 F.R.D. 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1961

a summary of the findings of the Board. … Evans v. United States, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 255 . United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States, D.C., 186 F.Supp. 824 .

Sun Secured Financing LLC v. ARCS Commercial Mortgage Co. LP

730 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2010

Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). 3 .

Irons v. Gottschalk

369 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1974

V. Contempt Motion. … The Patent Office has compiled five in-dices which comprehensively cover Board of Appeals decisions, Board of Patent Interference decisions, and Commissioner’s decisions.

Moore v. Justice Dept.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 2014

S(a); see Ashcrof‘ v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cz'ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califarzo, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The plaintiff, a resident of Jackson, Mississippi, purports to sue the United States Department of Justice and a construction company. Compl. at 2.

Bryant v. Leavitt

475 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2007

Teneyck v. Omni Shoreham Hotel, 365 F.3d 1139, 1149 (D.C.Cir.2004). See Lathram v. Snow, 336 F.3d 1085 , 1088 (D.C.Cir.2003); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … See Burton v. Batista, 339 F.Supp.2d 97, 110-11 (D.D.C.2004) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 ; Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 819 (D.C.Cir.2001)); cf. Weigert v.

Public Broadcasting Service v. Donald J. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2026

The CPB and the purportedly terminated Board members disputed the lawfulness of those terminations in two cases filed in this Court. Corp. for Pub. Broad. v. … Brown, 600 U.S. 551, 564 n.1 (2023), as reflected by the Supreme Court’s decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v.

Muhammad Husayn v. Gates

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2023

Al-Alwi v. Trump, 901 F.3d 294, 299 (D.C. Cir. 2018); see also Uthman v. Obama, 637 F.3d 400, 402 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing Hamdi v. … Ali v. Trump, 959 F.3d 364, 368 (D.C. Cir. 2020)(citing Exec. Order No. 15,567, 76 Fed. Reg. 13, 277 (March 7, 2011)(establishing the Periodic Review Board).

Paul v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2018

This decision was upheld by DCP’s Compensation Review Board, which found that the decision was supported by substantial evidence and denied plaintiff’s request to remand her case for a new hearing. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

United States v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

79 F. Supp. 485 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1948

The Court thinks that the question as to whether or not this case is controlled by the United States v. … Willard Wirtz, Members of the Board. 4.