Case law

UHAR & COMPANY, INC. v. Jacob

710 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Sun Secured Financing LLC v. ARCS Commercial Mortgage Co. LP

730 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2010

Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). 3 .

Fisher v. Clark Construction Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). And although the Court must construe Plaintiff’s pro se pleadings generously, even “pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” … President Lines, LLC v. Matson, Inc., 633 F.

Federal Trade Commission v. Alliant Techsystems Inc.

808 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1992

See e.g., Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United *20 States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.

286 F. Supp. 3d 264 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2017

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown , 564 U.S. 915 , 919, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 509 U.S. 209 , 222, 224, 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (U.S. 1993).

United States v. Carter

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2020

The government’s attempt to analogize this case to United States v. Brown, 334 F.3d 1161 (D.C. Cir. 2003), is also unpersuasive. … Brown, 334 F.3d at 1162. But Brown had a number of facts, absent here, that render the case distinguishable. First, the officers in Brown were responding to a 911 call with many specific details.

Adams v. Rice

484 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2007

Duncan v. WMATA, 240 F.3d 1110 , 1114 (D.C.Cir.2001) (en banc); Thompson v. Rice, 422 F.Supp.2d 158, 166 (D.D.C.2006). … See Brown Deck; Mem. for Employment Review Comm.; Adams Decl. ¶ 31.

Abeywardene v. Dejoy

District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2025

Generally, “the National Labor Relations Board [NLRB] has exclusive primary jurisdiction over claims involving unfair labor practices.” Price v. Unite Here Local 25, 883 F. … Brown, No. 94-cv-1018, 1996 WL 79490, at *4 (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 1996); Rattner v. Bennett, 701 F. Supp. 7, 9 (D.D.C. 1988). Mr.

Haque v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2015

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 US. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. T isch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Kittner v. Gates

783 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2011

First, in Brown v. … Bush v. Lucas, 462 U.S. 367, 388-90 , 103 S.Ct. 2404 , 76 L.Ed.2d 648 (1983). In United States v.

Bagby v. Xto Energy Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2012

o.r the Disfrict oi‘“(])or|iixir)rilii'a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY, ) Plaintiff, § v, § Civil Action No. … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, the complaint pertains to the acquisition of XTO Energy by EXxonMobil, and reflects the plaintiff s musings on the oil and gas industry.

United States v. Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($17,900.00) in United States Currency

200 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2016

Amtrak police found within the backpack a brown shopping bag containing $17,900 in U.S. currency. … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986); Laningham v. U.S. Dep’t of Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1241 (D.C.

Woubetu v. Pat Handy Legacy Shelter

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Melkumyan v. Power

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2022

P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The complaint must be construed “liberally in the plaintiff’s favor with the benefit of all reasonable inferences derived from the facts alleged.” … Staub v.

United States v. Thompson

275 F. Supp. 3d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2017

Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843, 1867 (2017). … In the end, the co-conspirators operating at defendants’ behest boarded a U.S.

Keats v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2020

Stuttering Found. of Am. v. Springer, 498 F. Supp. 2d 203, 207 (D.D.C. 2007). … Overton Park, Inc. v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA

310 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2004

(emphasis in original) (quoting Browning-Ferris Industries of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 265 , 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989)). … United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 407, 417 (5th Cir.1977) (citing cases). See also United States v.

Mitchell v. DCX, Inc.

274 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2003

See Brown v. … Brown, 782 A.2d at 760 n. 11.

United States v. Blalock

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2024

See id. § 3142(e)(3)(A); ECF No. 174 (operative indictment); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021) (RCL). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 168–69. Given the evidence to date, this factor weighs in favor of detention. See United States v. Brockhoff, 590 F.

Doroodchi v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … The Circuit’s passing statement in Khaksari v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board Of Governors, 451 F. App’x 1, 4 (D.C.