Opinion

Haque v. United States

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jun 22, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.7%

The opinion

FILED

JUN 22 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk. u.s. District 8. Bankruptcy

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts torthe District of Columbia

SERAJUL HAQUE, )

)

Plamtrff, ) Case: 1:15_Cv_00966 Jury Demand

V ; Assigned To :

. Assign. Date : I '

UNITED STATES ; Description: Pro Se Gen. ClVll (F Deck)

7 )

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff 5 application to proceed in forma pauperis and

his pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff’ s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted

by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 US. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,

must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. T isch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff submits a form “Employment Discrimination Complaint” purportedly alleging

discrimination based on his race, religion, sex, national origin, and “Retaliation/Age/Professional

etc.” Compl. at 2. Because the complaint contains no factual allegations whatsoever to support

an employment discrimination claim, as drafted, the complaint does not comply with Rule 8(a).

A separate order of dismissal is issued separately.

2 ,,

DATE: (é/IQ/ls’ 3 \/§& ~

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.