Case law

Atlas Air, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATLAS AIR, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. … under Section 5 of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), and completion of emergency board procedures thereafter if an emergency board is established under Section 10 of the RLA; (2) final adjudication of the pending case; or

Fulwood v. Clemmer

206 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1962

Brown, a Muslim Minister of the District of Columbia, and he stated he would be willing to teach in Lorton Reformatory the beliefs of the Muslims. … Justice Murphy in Chaplinsky v.

Maneely v. Donley

967 F. Supp. 2d 393 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2013

Kreis v. Sec'y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000); 9 Kight v. United States, 850 F. … Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997). The district court is not to function as a “super correction board.” Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43, 50 (D.D.C. 1998).

Noha v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reasons that there are no factual allegations.

Kosnik v. Peters

31 F. Supp. 2d 151 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1998

The Secretary may convene a special selection board if he determines that either the decision of the original selection board involved “material error of fact or material administrative error” or that the board did not have … See McDougall v. Widnall, 20 F.Supp.2d 78, 82 (D.D.C.1998); Walker v. Shannon, 848 F.Supp. 250, 254 (D.D.C.1994).

Evangelical Community Hospital v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022

Overton Park, Inc., v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 413–14 (1971), abrogated on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). … See, e.g., id. at 83–84 (upholding the Board’s authority to dismiss issues that were not presented in accordance with the Board’s procedural rules); Inova Alexandria Hosp. v.

McKeeman v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reason that there are no factual allegations supporting an actual legal claim. see Compl. at 4.

District of Columbia v. United Leasing Associates of America, Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2009

(quoting Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 815-16 (4th Cir. 2003) (en banc)); Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. … Superior Court, Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998), for the reasons stated in plaintiff’s reply brief. Pl.’s Reply Br. at 13-16; see also Brown, 26 F.

United States v. Mahoney

698 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 1988

The defendant relies on Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1957). … Similar claims of lack of grand jury jurisdiction based on Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1957), have been rejected by this Court when presented in circumstances similar to the present case.

Star Lake Railroad v. Lujan

737 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1990

BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW Plaintiff Star Lake Railroad (Star Lake) is appealing a final decision by the Interior Department’s Interior Board of Indian Appeals (IBIA or Board) affirming the Navajo Area Board of Indian … The Board's decision does not discuss it. If indeed the claim was not presented to the agency in the first instance, it cannot be pressed on this Court. Washington Association for Television & Children v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

907 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2012

Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n, 131 S. Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. A.C.L.U., 535 U.S. 564, 573 (2002)). … See Brown, 131 S. Ct. at 2733 (discussing categories of unprotected speech).

Shepherd v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

862 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1994

Theodore Brown, Jr., does not assert that Graves suffers from PTSD. (Brown Decl. (Ex. D to Pl.’s Final Proposed Order for Relief).) … Brown found that “[a]fter losing the position at ABC Mr.

Cemex, Inc. v. Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2021

It has also moved for summary 2 The Board’s decision constituted a “final agency action for purposes of judicial review.” Aera Energy LLC v. Salazar, 642 F.3d 212, 218 (D.C. … United States v. Miranda, 780 F.3d 1185, 1189 (D.C. Cir. 2015). 9 Board.” Underwood Livestock, Inc. v. United States, 417 F. App’x 934, 939 (Fed.

Virgin Islands Housing and Finance Authority v. Federal Emergency Management Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2024

To start, it waited six weeks before moving to reconsider before the Board—a motion that was clearly not proper. Reply at 21; see Young v. SEC, 956 F.3d 650, 656 (D.C. … Pace v.

Hardrick v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2026

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 (1997)). Not so at all. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs, 520 U.S. at 406.

Hayes v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2022

By “not addressing the issue in his [Opposition], the Court may treat Plaintiff as conceding any objection to” the standard applied by the Board. See Harrington v. … This is because “the function of this Court is not to serve as a super correction board that reweighs the evidence.” Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43, 50 (D.D.C. 1998).

McKeeman v. Black Charley

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis Gmbh

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2010

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … Laningham v. U.S. Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242-43 (D.C.

Houston v. Pavilion USA 2020, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2023

The Board failed to approve the resolution for termination. Id. ¶ 45. The Independent Directors called for a Board meeting that included Plaintiff. Id. ¶ 45. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 557 (2007)).

Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wall

743 F. Supp. 901 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 1990

Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856, 2866 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983) (quoting, Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. … Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C.Cir.1989). Here, Congress has conferred a great deal of discretion upon the Bank Board.