Case law

St. Mary's of Michigan v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2020

When reviewing the decision of an administrative board under the APA, “the district court does not perform its normal role but instead sits as an appellate tribunal.” Cty. of L.A. v. Shalala, 192 F.3d 1005, 1011 (D.C. … Hosp. v.

Procacci v. Sigler

61 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 1973

The Parole Board sitting en banc in Washington, D.C., denied his requests. The Board did not provide any reasons for the denials. The Board did state, in response to an inquiry from Mr. … The decision set to rest the contrary interpretation which emanated from Ahrens v. Clark, 335 u. S. 188, 68 S.Ct. 1443 , 92 L.Ed. 1898 (1948).

Jones v. United States Parole Commission

860 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2012

The District of Columbia Code “provides no substantive limitations on the Board’s authority to grant parole which would create a liberty interest.” Price v. Barry, 53 F.3d 369, 370 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … And under the 1987 Regulations, “parole is never ‘required after the Board determines that the necessary prerequisites exist.’” Ellis v. District of Columbia, 84 F.3d 1413, 1420 (D.C.

Hessing-Roper v. Commissioner for Patents

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2025

Stewart Org. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988) (quoting Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 622 (1964)). … According to the government, the operative decision is the Board’s denial on rehearing. Mot. Dismiss at 6. But the government does not cite any authority defining what “final Board decision” means.

Wortham v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2014

See Wilkinson v. … DATE: May 1, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Pam Squared at Texarkana, LLC v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2020

See, e.g., Dillmon v. NTSB, 588 F.3d 1085, 1090–92 (D.C. … Id.; see also Chen v. GAO, 821 F.2d 732, 734–36 (D.C.

Hill v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 2017

Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). … Supp. 2d 101, 109 (D.D.C. 2008); Cole v. Harrison, 271 F. Supp. 2d 51, 53 (D.D.C. 2002); see Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 9 (D.C. 1994).

de Samala v. United States

183 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1960

In De Pusana v. … Cole v.

United States v. Norcome

375 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1974

Mills v. Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). (Waddy, J.) … See Chance v. Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1972); Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 , 91 S.Ct. 849 , 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971).

Ford v. Tait

163 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2001

The Board appoints the Bar Counsel to act as the “disciplinary arm of the D.C. Courts.” See Anderson v. D.C. Public Defender Service, 756 F.Supp. 28, 31 (D.D.C.1991) (citing D.C. Rules Ann. … See Huffman v.

Connecticut Department of Children & Youth Services v. Department of Health & Human Services

788 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1992

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971); Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 1649 , 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985). … In Bowen v.

Hartke v. McKelway

526 F. Supp. 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1981

See also King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436 , 439 & n. 2 (5th Cir. 1979); Brown, Federal Special Verdicts: The Doubt Eliminator, 44 F.R.D. 245 (1967). … Lee, 78 A.D.2d 180 , 434 N.Y.S.2d 300 (1980), appeal dismissed, 53 N.Y.2d 797 (1981); Public Health Trust v. Brown, 388 So.2d 1084 (Fla.App.1980); Berman v. Allan, 80 N.J. 421 , 404 A.2d 8 (1979); Wilczynski v.

Bilal-Edwards v. United Planning Organization

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2014

K (Declaration of Jemeka Brown (“Brown Decl.”)) ¶¶ 4, 6-7). “[I]n late 2009 or early 2010, [] Rorie spoke with DeVita Lanham, another [Division] Case Manager, about changing positions in the [Division].” … “This request did not involve a change in position or a reduction in pay,” and was a request “to temporarily help with James Creek until the new employee was on board.” Id.

Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2010

Sanders v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 97-1238, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6818 at *5 (Apr. 15, 2002) (quoting Brown v. United States, 742 F. 2d 1498, 1509 (D.C. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F.

Hairston v. Tapella

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2009

B), Utz’s declaration does not refute that Hairston met with Brown. Additionally, the GPO attached to its motion a right to sue letter issued by Brown. (Def.’s Mem. Ex. C.) … Taken together, the evidence could support the inference that Hairston met with Brown.

Gasser v. Ramsey

125 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 2000

Both parties correctly cite Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.Cir.1999), a recent D.C. Circuit opinion addressing this issue. … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 456 -57 (citing Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998)). V.

McKinney v. Birch

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  The Court understands plaintiff to claim ownership of real property.

Wilhelmus v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2011

Laningham v. U.S. … This case is, accordingly, remanded to the Board so that it may consider the applicability of case AR200309457 in reaching its decision here. See, e.g., Kendall v.

McKeeman v. Famelmers

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

Wadelton v. Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2018

Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 742 (D.C. Cir. 1979). A. … See Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 743 (D.C. Cir. 1979).