Case law

Shea v. United States

45 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1999

See Miller v. Baker, 969 F.2d 1098, 1098 (D.C.Cir.1992); 22 U.S.C. § 4137 (d). … Reiner v. United States, 686 F.2d 1017 , 1022 n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1982) (declining to decide if an FSGB hearing was formal or informal adjudication); Bettucci v.

Graphic Sciences, Inc. v. International Mogul Mines Ltd.

397 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 1974

to place four nominees on the Board. … member of Graphic’s Board.

Los Alamitos General Hospital, Inc. v. Donnelly

558 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1983

Los Alamitos requested a hearing before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“Board”), which was held on June 13, 1978. See 42 C.F.R. § 405.1835 . … See Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Harris, 501 F.Supp. at 316 .

Wortham v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2014

See Wilkinson v. … DATE: May 1, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Pam Squared at Texarkana, LLC v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2020

See, e.g., Dillmon v. NTSB, 588 F.3d 1085, 1090–92 (D.C. … Id.; see also Chen v. GAO, 821 F.2d 732, 734–36 (D.C.

Harmon v. Brucker

137 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1956

Plaintiff then applied unsuccessfully to the Army Discharge Review Board and the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records to have the character of his discharge changed from Undesirable on the ground that his services … See Patterson v. Lamb, 1947, 329 U.S. 539, 542 , 67 S.Ct. 448 , 91 L.Ed. 485 . 5 . United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 1955, 350 U.S. 11 , 76 S.Ct. 1 .

Ford v. Tait

163 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2001

The Board appoints the Bar Counsel to act as the “disciplinary arm of the D.C. Courts.” See Anderson v. D.C. Public Defender Service, 756 F.Supp. 28, 31 (D.D.C.1991) (citing D.C. Rules Ann. … See Huffman v.

Lewis v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., Inc.

416 F. Supp. 514 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1976

. § 1601 et seq. and Regulation Z of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board, 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq. (1976). … Courts have previously refused to accept this argument, e. g., Ives v. W. T. Grant Co., supra; Welmaker v. W. T. Grant Co., 365 F.Supp. 531 (N.D.Ga.1972); Black v. B. G.

Dole v. National Alliance of Postal & Federal Employees

725 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1989

F-1, F-2; Board Minutes (April 1989), p. 11. This court now has subject-matter jurisdiction over the Secretary’s attempts to enforce the election results. 29 U.S.C. § 482 (b); see e.g., Dunlop v. … Shelley v. Brock, 793 F.2d 1368, 1372 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Flint v. Alex M. Azar, II

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2020

Partners, L.P. v. Burwell, 786 F.3d 46, 49 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Cape Cod Hosp. v. Sebelius, 630 F.3d 203, 205 (D.C. … Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelius, 37 F.

Mehle v. American Management Systems, Inc.

172 F. Supp. 2d 203 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2001

Providence Journal Co., 485 U.S. at 705 n. 9, 108 S.Ct. 1502 ; United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe, 135 F.3d 558, 562 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Alky Enters., Inc., 969 F.2d 1309, 1313-14 (1st Cir.1992); ICC v. … See also Molton, Allen & Williams, Inc. v.

Marcus v. Department of Treasury

813 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 541-43 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.

Boudin v. Dulles

136 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 1955

Shachtman v. Dulles, D.C.Cir., 1955, 225 F.2d 938 ; Bauer v. Acheson, D.C.1952, 106 F.Supp. 445 ; Williams v. Fears, 1900, 179 U.S. 270, 274 , 21 S.Ct. 128 , 45 L.Ed. 186 . … See Dulles v. Nathan, D.C.Cir., 1955, 225 F.2d 29, 30-31 .

First National Bank of Homestead v. Watson

363 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1973

The Board subsequently allowed the acquisition. Plaintiffs did not challenge the application in the administrative proceeding before the Board nor did they appeal the Board’s decision. … Hanly v.

International Ass'n of MacHinists Workers v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

654 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 1987

National Mediation Board, 425 F.2d 527, 536 (D.C.Cir.1970); International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Ry. Airline and S.S. … In Williams v.

Tanner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

475 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Procacci v. Sigler

61 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 1973

The Parole Board sitting en banc in Washington, D.C., denied his requests. The Board did not provide any reasons for the denials. The Board did state, in response to an inquiry from Mr. … The decision set to rest the contrary interpretation which emanated from Ahrens v. Clark, 335 u. S. 188, 68 S.Ct. 1443 , 92 L.Ed. 1898 (1948).

Milton S. Kronheim & Co. v. District of Columbia

877 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 1995

Quality Brands, Inc. v. Barry, Civ. No. 88-1999. … Maine v. Taylor, 477 U.S. 131, 138-39 , 106 S.Ct. 2440, 2447 , 91 L.Ed.2d 110 (1986) (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted). See also Wyoming v.

Robinson v. Dalton

45 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 1998

Analysis A military service Secretary’s correction-board decisions are subject to review under § 706 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706 . Chappell v. … Blassingame v. Sec’y of the Navy, 866 F.2d 556, 559 (2d Cir.1989) (citing Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 , 77 S.Ct. 1152 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1957) and Neal v.

Hairston v. Tapella

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2009

B), Utz’s declaration does not refute that Hairston met with Brown. Additionally, the GPO attached to its motion a right to sue letter issued by Brown. (Def.’s Mem. Ex. C.) … Taken together, the evidence could support the inference that Hairston met with Brown.