Case law

Thomas v. Knight

257 F. Supp. 2d 86 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

Bar Rule XI, § 4, which created the Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”). … P’ship v.

Artis v. Greenspan

307 F.R.D. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2014

Board failed to respond.” … See, e.g., Moore v. Napolitano, 926 F.

Simon v. Hofgard

172 F. Supp. 3d 308 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2016

See Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 180 (D.D.C. 2003). … Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 78 (D.D.C. 1998) (quotation and alteration omitted); see also id.

Wilson v. Mabus

65 F. Supp. 3d 127 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2014

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). An adverse employment action usually inflicts "tangible economic harm," but this was not the case for plaintiff, Douglas, 559 F.3d at 552 (citing Forkkio v. … Hamilton v. Geithner, 666 F.3d 1344, 1357 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (intemal citations omitted); see also Jones v. Bernanke 557 F.3d 670, 677 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Boss v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2025

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … DOE v. Rogers, 139 F. Supp. 3d 120, 169 (D.D.C. 2015); see Browning–Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v.

Bootery, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

326 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1971

In Goldberg v. … Unlike Dilday v.

Lee v. Government of the District of Columbia

920 F. Supp. 2d 127 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2013

F (Memorandum from Joseph Peters, Hearing Officer, to Devon Brown (June 20, 2008)) at 2; Brown Termination Letter at 1. Ms. Perry denies having taken the picture, Perry Dep. at 56–57, 72–73, and Mr. … Franks Dep., Ex. 7 (Letter from Devon Brown, Director, District of Columbia Department of Corrections, to Joseph Lee (Apr. 3, 2008)); Brown Termination Letter at 2–3.

Bardo v. Alvarado

District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 2013

_______________________ ) KARIM BARDO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: May 28, 2013 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Wallace v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2013

WALLACE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil … DATE: November 20, 2013 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

McKinney v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2020

Military board decisions are entitled to even greater deference than other agency actions. Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d 319, 324 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … See Lujan v.

Chewning v. Schlesinger

471 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 1979

As the Supreme Court observed in Brown v. … Powell, 532 F.2d 727, 729 (10th Cir. 1976); Adams v. Brinegar, 521 F.2d 129, 133-34 (7th Cir. 1975); Brown v.

Sirmans v. Brownlee

346 F. Supp. 2d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2004

V. … Blevins v. Orr, 721 F.2d 1419, 1421-21 (D.C.Cir.1983). IV.

Harrison v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

68 F. Supp. 3d 160 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2014

Notably, there is no Federal Circuit opinion that adopts the Board’s approach. 4 Most importantly, after the cited 4 Plaintiff cites to one Federal Circuit opinion in her reply, Duncan v. … Circuit’s interpretation of the antiretaliation provision of Title VII over those employed by other circuits, including the one adopted by the Board, in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. v.

Granheim v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2023

Rich v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 3d 263, 273 (D.D.C. 2019) (Hogan, J.) (quoting Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 90 (D.D.C. 2006) (Bates, J.)). … He points to Fail v.

Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2011

. v. … . v.

Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

597 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1984

See PSF ¶¶ V-O — V-X; DRPF ¶¶ V-O — V-X; DSF ¶¶ 2-13; PSGI 112-13. … PSF ¶¶ V-H — V-J; DRPF ¶¶ V-H — V-J; see Practices, supra, at 629.

Cox v. Headley

265 F. 981 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1920

Tlje Board further found that Cox had not shown that his combination was susceptible of being substituted in machines of the prior art. … Podlesak v. McInnerney, 26 App. D. C. 399; Sobey v. Holsclaw, 28 App. D. C. 65; Miel v. Young, 29 App. D. C. 481; Kirby v. Clements, 44 App. D. C. 12; Seymour v. Molyneux (present term) 271 O. G. 688 .

Paducah Water Co. v. Commissioner

33 F.2d 559 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

Appeal from a decision of the' Board of Tax Appeals, involving income and profit taxes for the calendar years 1919, 1920, and 1921. … See Komada & Co. v. United States, 215 U. S. 392 , 30 S. Ct. 136 , 54 L. Ed. 249 ; National Lead Co. v. United States, 252 U. S. 140 , 40 S. Ct. 237 , 64 L. Ed. 496 .

National Maritime Union of America v. Herzog

78 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1948

Case v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin. Steel Corp.. 801 U.S. 1 , 57 -S.Ct. 615, 81 L. Ed. 893 .

Alford v. Defense Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 2012

See Mot., Exh. 16 (Excerpts from Transcript of January 24, 2011, Merit Systems Protection Board Hearing) at 27. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C. Cir. 1999). Rather, because “job-related constructive criticism . . .