Opinion

Bardo v. Alvarado

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
May 28, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

KARIM BARDO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1944 (KBJ)

)

PETER ALVARADO, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 8, 2013, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary

judgment [ECF No. 11]. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and

specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by May 10, 2013, the Court

may treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the

motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the

defendants’ motion as conceded.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: May 28, 2013 /s/

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.