Case law

Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

132 F. Supp. 3d 98 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2015

See, e.g., Board of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys. v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 4 08 U.S. 564, 5 77 ( 197 2) .

Ramos v. United States Department of Justice

682 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 2010

INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the pro se plaintiffs motion for recusal and motion to vacate. 1 The plaintiff brought suit challenging the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) to … Comm’ns Co. v. Am. Tel. & Tel.

Al-Hawsawi v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2024

Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Estelle, 429 U.S. at 106). … And as my - colleagues in those cases found, Sa/ahi is distinguishable factually: the periodic review board there had “discretion” in considering a detainee’s status, as did the Secretary of Defense in accepting the board

Chinchillo v. Powell

236 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2003

See Sampson v. … Cleveland v.

Mori v. Department of the Navy

917 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 2013

See Miller v. … board members.”

Henderson v. United States

580 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1983

Reiner, supra; Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251 , 66 S.Ct. 574 , 90 L.Ed. 652 (1946); Day v. Mathews, 530 F.2d 1083 (D.C.Cir.1976); Ehrman v. United States, C.A. No. 82-1984 (D.D.C.1983). … City of Cleveland, Ohio v. FPC, 525 F.2d 845 , 856 n. 89 (D.C.Cir.1976), quoting Williams v.

Madden v. International Union, United Mine Workers

79 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1948

The Court thinks that they are disposed of effectively in the case of Evans, the regional director of the Ninth Region, National Labor Relations Board, v. … Petitioner is Regional Director of the Fifth Region of -the National Labor Relations Board (herein called the Board). 2.

Hunter v. Reilly

693 F. Supp. 2d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

Parole Board Rules.... … See Wilson v.

Smith v. Rubicon Advisors, LLC

254 F. Supp. 3d 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2017

United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F. … (citing Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1247 (D.C. 1986))).

McConnell v. Howard University

621 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1985

See Smith v. Kent State University, 696 F.2d 476 (6th Cir.1983); Stastny v. Board of Trustees of Central Washington University, 32 Wash.App. 239 , 647 P.2d 496, 502, 506-07 (1982), cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 1528 (1983). … As in Williams v.

Costello v. District of Columbia

826 F. Supp. 2d 221 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2011

Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Monell v. … [Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)].

Cone v. Caldera

46 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 1999

See Castañeda v. … See also Small v.

United States v. Medical Society

26 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 1938

I do not think the foregoing provisions of the subpoena can be justified by the decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. … They may partake of the form of the subpoena in the Brown Case, but I think they fail in substance to meet the spirit of the rule.

Wine v. U.S. Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2022

Rann v. Chao, 209 F. … Thus, there is no live controversy as to the Board’s initial, procedural dismissal and Wine’s Rule 59(e) motion is moot as to this claim. See, e.g., Cierco v. Lew, 190 F.

Doyle v. England

193 F. Supp. 2d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2002

In the absence of clear and persuasive evidence to the contrary, courts should presume that the Secretary and selection boards performed fairly and lawfully. See Boyd v. … See Nation v.

McGrady v. England

810 F. Supp. 2d 281 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2011

Mueller v. Winter, 485 F.3d 1191, 1199 (D.C. Cir. 2007). … Smith v. Dalton, 927 F. Supp. 1, 5 (D.D.C. 1996) (quoting Cruse v. Bowen, 867 F.2d 1183, 1184 (8th Cir. 1989)).

Newton v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

905 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2012

Second, the statute suggests judicial, not Board, primacy by providing that courts, rather than the Board, shall (if necessary) have the final word on all complaints. … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 70 (2006); see also Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 902 (D.C.

Kinsey v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025

Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 105 F.4th 437, 443 (D.C. Cir. 2024).  Kinsey filed this suit against W. Hartley Powell, Director of the state’s tax department. … Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)).

Engel v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Additionally, “each allegation [in a pleading] must be simple, concise, and direct[,]” Fed. R. Civ. … See Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499 (collecting cases) (citation omitted).

McKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

See EPA v. … In support of its argument, the Board cites two cases: Quarles v. Dep’t of the Navy, 893 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir. 1990), and Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 491 F.2d 63 (D.C. Cir. 1974.)