Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

2.02s

  • Gagnon v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2014

    Cir. 2006) (quoting Schrecker v. Dep’t of Justice, 217 F. Supp. 2d 29, 35 (D.D.C.2002)). … Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson United States District Judge DATE: December 3, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Angel v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

    519 F. Supp. 1173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1981

    Co. v. … United States v. Western Pacific Ry., 352 U.S. 59, 64 , 77 S.Ct. 161, 165 , 1 L.Ed.2d 126 (1956). See also Board of Education v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S., Inc. v. Babbitt, 913 F. Supp. 5 (1995)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. Federal Crop Insurance

    517 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2007

    As stated supra, the Board did not have sufficient information to apply the 45-day limitation period based on a “harmonious reading.” Instead, the Board relied on S.O.G. of Arkansas v. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Newbridge Networks Securities Litigation

    962 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1997

    In Kowal v. … Brown analysts. The Second Amended Complaint now contains allegations that Mr. Marshall had “numerous” contacts with Nicholas P. Coutros of Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated (“Alex.Brown”). It alleges that Mi*.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. United States

    34 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 1998

    Matlovich v. Secretary of Air Force, 591 F.2d 852, 857 (D.C.Cir.1978). … Appalachian Power Co. v. E.P.A., 135 F.3d 791, 821 (D.C.Cir.1998); see also Unbelievable, Inc. v. NLRB, 118 F.3d 795 , 809 n. 3 (D.C,Cir.1997). "This principle, grounded in the reasoning of SEC v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.

    916 F. Supp. 1276 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1996

    Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1729 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam))). Absence of prejudice to the other party and due diligence are important considerations, see Spannaus v. … See, e.g., Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hoffmann-Laroche, Inc. v. Califano

    453 F. Supp. 900 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 1978

    V 1975); 45 C.F.R. § 19.5 (1976). … void, citing Home Box Office, Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Trailways of New England, Inc. v. United States

    235 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 1964

    See also Yale Transport Corp. v. United States, 210 F.Supp. 862, 864-865 (S.D.N.Y.1962) ; Capital Transit Co. v. United States, 97 F.Supp. 614, 618, 621 (D.D.C.1951). . Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 492-497 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Federal Communications Comm’n v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp., 349 U.S. 358, 564-565 , 75 S.Ct. 855 , 99 L.Ed. 1147 (1955). .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Estate of Phillips v. District of Columbia

    257 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

    Plaintiffs’ Claims In this matter, four cases have been consolidated for all purposes: Lysa Lambert Phillips v. District of Columbia, Civ. Action No. 00-1113 Cassandra Brown Shields v. District of Columbia, Civ. … Each of the alleged conspirators were employees of the School Board.

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Estate of Phillips v. District of Columbia, 455 F.3d 397 (2006)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State of Alabama Department of Human Resources v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

    478 F. Supp. 2d 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2007

    Back Country Horsemen of America v. … Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504 , 114 S.Ct. 2381 , 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994); Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 499 U.S. 144 , 111 S.Ct. 1171 , 113 L.Ed.2d 117 (1991).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Saha v. Teladoc Health Medical Group, P.A.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2025

    For example, in Browning v. Clinton, the D.C. … But Browning’s claim survived because she identified a specific example of a prospective publishing contract that was allegedly terminated due to the defendant’s conduct. Id. Similarly, in Banneker Ventures, LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Authority v. Concerned Senior Citizens of the Roosevelt Tenant Ass'n

    129 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2000

    Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). See also Gomez v. … See, e.g., Public Citizen v. U.S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ratley v. United States Postal Service

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2013

    LCvR 7(b); see also Fox v. American Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C. … Date: November 6, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Movers' & Warehousemen's Ass'n of America v. United States

    227 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1964

    Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658 , 83 S.Ct. 984 , 10 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963). … But see -National Motor Freight. *251 Traffic Assn. v. United States, 372 U.S. 246 , 83 S.Ct. 688 , 9 L.Ed.2d 709 (1963). . Cf. S. S. W., Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lefrancois v. Mabus

    910 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 26, 2012

    Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F.Supp.2d 76, 89 (D.D.C.2006); see also Charter Operators of Alaska v. Blank, 844 F.Supp.2d 122, 126-27 (D.D.C.2012); Buckingham v. Mabus, 772 F.Supp.2d 295, 300 (D.D.C. 2011). … The Court. reviews decisions by military correction boards under “an unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary or capricious standard.’ ” Kreis, 866 F.2d at 1514 ; see also Cone v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Genesis Health Ventures of Naugatuck, Inc. v. Leavitt

    563 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2008

    Ctr. v. Leavitt, 531 F.3d 844 , 2008 WL 2550542 (D.C.Cir.2008) (quoting Landgraf v. … A district court upheld the Board’s decision. See Pleasant Care Corp. v. Leavitt, No. 05-05456, (C.D.Cal. Aug. 2, 2006).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Futch

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2013

    Vactor v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 815 F. Supp. 2d 81, 84 (D.D.C. 2011). “[A] case is moot when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Powell v. … Date: July 29, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamrick v. United States

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2009

    See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957); Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Complaint here does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8(a)(2). … Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499 (citations omitted). Such dismissals may be made on motion or sua sponte by the court. Resource N.E. of Long Island, Inc. v. Babylon, 28 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Price v. Kelly

    847 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1994

    See, e.g., Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987) (prison regulations granted inmates a protected interest in parole); Hewitt v. … See, e.g., Kimberlin v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. v. Sebelius

    798 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2011

    Ctr., Inc. v. … Ctr. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.