Case law

Pentagen Technologies Int'l, Ltd. v. Committee on Appropriations of the United States House of Representatives

20 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1998

The Brown & Williamson Court stated that “[t]he law is clear that ... use of [ ] documents by the committee staff in the course of official business is privileged legislative activity.” 62 F.3d at 417 (quoting McSurely v. … Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 420 .

Cage v. McHugh

963 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2013

duty pursuant to a decision made by the Army Reduction in Force Board for fiscal year 1992 ("RIF Board"). … Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. ofAm., 511 U.S. 375, 377 ( 1994 ). Accordingly, a plaintiff must establish that the Court possesses jurisdiction by a preponderance ofthe evidence. See Hollingsworth v. Duff, 444 F.

Reid v. Mayorkas

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2026

Cf., e.g., Brown v. U.S. EPA, 384 F. Supp. 2d 271, 276 (D.D.C. 2005) (finding standing where attorney stated in the request that “‘I represent Paula D. Brown,’ and that ‘Ms. … O’Brien did not state that he was representing Plaintiffs and making the request on behalf of Plaintiffs, as the attorney did in Brown. See 384 F. Supp. 2d at 276; see also Mahtesian v. U.S. Off. of Pers.

In Re: Bapa Holdings, Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2026

Id. at 4; see Daimler AG v. … Hertz Corp. v.

In Re Newbridge Networks Securities Litigation

962 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1997

In Kowal v. … Brown analysts. The Second Amended Complaint now contains allegations that Mr. Marshall had “numerous” contacts with Nicholas P. Coutros of Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated (“Alex.Brown”). It alleges that Mi*.

Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad v. Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen

253 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 1966

Under the Railway Labor Act, as it has been construed by the Supreme Court in Virginian Railway Co. v. … In this connection the Court refers to its decision in Southern Pacific Co. v. National Mediation Board, D.C., 223 F.Supp. 951 , and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v.

Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

197 F. Supp. 3d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2016

H (Appeals Board decision) at 6 (summarizing the Appeals Board’s conclusions). The Appeals Board decision constituted final agency action, id., Ex. … Armenian Assembly of Am., Inc. v. Cafesjian, 597 F. Supp. 2d 128, 133–34 (D.D.C. 2009). However, legal conclusions masquerading as factual allegations are not enough to survive a motion to dismiss. Browning v.

Empire Trails, Inc. v. United States

53 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 1942

Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 953, 957 ; Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 478 , 56 S.Ct. 906 , 80 L.Ed. 1288 ; Woodruff v. United States, D.C., 40 F. Supp. 949 . … Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658 , 47 S.Ct. 222 , 71 L.Ed. 463 ; Interstate Com. Comm. v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 227 U.S. 88 , 33 S.Ct. 185 , 57 L.Ed. 431 ; Merchants Warehouse Co. v.

Harrison v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

68 F. Supp. 3d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2014

Plaintiff points to two Board decisions supporting her argument that the antiretaliation provision of the CAA should be read more broadly than that of Title VII. Pl.’s Mot. at 7-8 (citing Solomon v. … Circuit’s interpretation of the antiretaliation provision of Title VII over those employed by other circuits, including the one adopted by the Board, in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. v.

Lubow v. United States Department of State

730 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2010

Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, 560 F.Supp.2d 21, 23 (D.D.C.2008); accord Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C.Cir.1993); see also Citizens Against the Pellissippi Parkway Extension, Inc. v. … Power & Light Co. v.

Pindle v. Poteat

360 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2003

See Sheary v. United States Parole Comm’n, 822 F.2d 556, 557 (5th Cir.1987); Wallace v. Christensen, 802 F.2d 1539, 1553-54 (9th Cir.1986); DiNapoli v. … Forman v. McCall, 776 F.2d 1156, 1158 (3d Cir.1985); see Allston v. Gaines, 158 F.Supp.2d 76, 82 (D.D.C.2001).

Lindsay v. Kissinger

367 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 1973

Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 442 , 80 S.Ct. 1502 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960). … Thompson v. Washington, No. 71-2049 (D.C.Cir. Dec. 10, 1973).

Singh v. District of Columbia

881 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 2012

United States v. Abdus-Price, 518 F.3d 926, 929–30 (D.C. Cir. 2008); United States v. Board, 744 F. Supp. 6, 8 (D.D.C. 1990). … Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1284 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Jones v. Horne, 634 F.3d 588, 601 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Norman E. Duquette, Inc. v. Commissioner

110 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2000

See Morgan v. United States, 953 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir.1992) (unpublished), 1992 WL 14934 ; Wilkerson v. United States, 839 F.Supp. 440, 444 (E.D.Tex.1993); Brown v. … See Wilkerson v. United States, 839 F.Supp. at 444 ; Brown v. United States, 755 F.Supp. at 287 .

Dalbis v. Pubic Employees of Security and Intelligence Services of France and Europe

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); Hamrick v. United States, No. 10-cv-857, 2010 WL 3324721, at *1 (D.D.C. … Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Seneca Nation of Indians v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

144 F. Supp. 3d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2015

Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). … McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140, 145 (1992).

Lindsay v. Wilkie

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland Board of Education v.

Johnson v. Hartogensis

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2023

Brown, August 26, 2013, ECF 39-1 at 2, and Ms. Brown giving Ms. Johnson a lowered performance rating, November 7, 2013, id. at 204. See Buggs v. Powell, 293 F. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C. Cir. 1999), overruled on other grounds by Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. Cir. 2022).

White v. Herzog

80 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1948

Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 105 , 143 F.2d 145 .” … Other cases supporting the conclusion that the constitutional guarantees of due process were not denied plaintiffs include: Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, supra; Buttfield v.

Coleman v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VANESSA COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. … The notice further stated that a trial would take place before a FEMS Fire Trial Board (“Trial Board”).