Case law

Norman E. Duquette, Inc. v. Commissioner

110 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2000

See Morgan v. United States, 953 F.2d 1391 (10th Cir.1992) (unpublished), 1992 WL 14934 ; Wilkerson v. United States, 839 F.Supp. 440, 444 (E.D.Tex.1993); Brown v. … See Wilkerson v. United States, 839 F.Supp. at 444 ; Brown v. United States, 755 F.Supp. at 287 .

Seneca Nation of Indians v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

144 F. Supp. 3d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2015

Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). … McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140, 145 (1992).

Lindsay v. Wilkie

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland Board of Education v.

Johnson v. Hartogensis

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2023

Brown, August 26, 2013, ECF 39-1 at 2, and Ms. Brown giving Ms. Johnson a lowered performance rating, November 7, 2013, id. at 204. See Buggs v. Powell, 293 F. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C. Cir. 1999), overruled on other grounds by Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. Cir. 2022).

Miller v. Lehman

603 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 1985

Mullane v. … Benvenuti v.

White v. Herzog

80 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1948

Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 105 , 143 F.2d 145 .” … Other cases supporting the conclusion that the constitutional guarantees of due process were not denied plaintiffs include: Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, supra; Buttfield v.

Chan v. Bell

464 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1978

Surprisingly, the Board of Immigration Appeals has declined to follow Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, supra, in which the U.S. … Scalzo v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

337 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2004

See Hunt v. … See Tower v.

Coleman v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VANESSA COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. … The notice further stated that a trial would take place before a FEMS Fire Trial Board (“Trial Board”).

Goodrich Corp. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

593 F. Supp. 2d 184 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2009

Neal v. Kelly, 963 F.2d 453, 456 (D.C.Cir.1992). … EPA purposely shared the results of the vadose zone model with the Regional Board.

Williams v. Stake

75 F. Supp. 3d 185 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2014

See Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 n.1 (1984); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). The 90th day after March 30, 2014, is June 28, which is a Saturday, so June 30, a Monday, operates as the due date. … Board of Education of City of Chicago, 45 F.3d 161, 165 (7th Cir. 1995) (acknowledging possibility that “the time remains in suspension 5 for a reasonable time . . .

Robb v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2025

Mont- gomery v. Mayorkas, Nos. 23-cv-3931, 24-cv-1697, 2024 WL 4973406, at *5 (D.D.C. Dec. 4, 2024) (quoting Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 143 (D.C. Cir. 2002)); see also, e.g. Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia, No. 17-cv-348, 2019 WL 3423208, at *7 (D.D.C.

Galvin v. Harker

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2023

Overton Park, Inc. v. … Miller v. Dep’t of Navy, 601 F.

West v. Holder

60 F. Supp. 3d 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2014

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 2853 (2011). … Mouzavires v.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Doll

841 F. Supp. 2d 238 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2012

Farm Bureau v. EPA, 121 F. Supp. 2d 84, 91 (D.D.C. 2000). A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Browning v. … Cir. 2009) (“By filing a timely petition to reopen, [plaintiff] rendered the Board’s decision nonfinal . . . .”); Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. v. EPA, 139 F.3d 914, 919 (D.C.

Eaton v. D'AMATO

581 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 1980

Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36 (D.C.Cir.1958); Den v. Den, 222 A.2d 647 (D.C.App.1966). … Brown v. Coates, supra at 40. The Court has grave doubts, on the record thus far presented, that the requisite degree of malice or recklessness is present here.

Chambers v. Green

544 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 2008

Limited Review Under the APA The Secretary’s denial of an application for correction to a military board of records corrections is a final agency action renewable under the Administrative Procedure Act. See Miller v. … Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d 319, 325 (D.C.Cir. 2006). Decisions of a military records correction board “can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v.

United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.

916 F. Supp. 1276 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1996

Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1729 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam))). Absence of prejudice to the other party and due diligence are important considerations, see Spannaus v. … See, e.g., Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam).

Dalbis v. Pubic Employees of Security and Intelligence Services of France and Europe

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); Hamrick v. United States, No. 10-cv-857, 2010 WL 3324721, at *1 (D.D.C. … Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Hechinger v. Martin

411 F. Supp. 650 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1976

In Kaelin v. … In Lo Frisco v.