Case law

Harper v. Bessent

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2025

Order On July 22, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, concluding their removal as National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”) Board members was unlawful. Harper v. … Co. v.

Aviel v. Gor

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2025

LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. … Berry v.

Kingman Park Civic Association v. Gray

27 F. Supp. 3d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2014

See Ekwem v. … For Washington’s Riverfront Parks v. Thompson, 451 A.2d 1177, 1183 (D.C. 1982) (citing Shiflett v. Dist. of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, 431 A.2d 9, 10-11 (D.C. 1981)).

States v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2019

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … In Jones v.

Benson v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2011

After considering the plaintiff’s case, the review board upheld CMS’s demand for $25,868.58. Id. … v.

Taylor v. Islamic Republic of Iran

881 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2012

Islamic Republic of Iran, 853 F.Supp.2d 44 (D.D.C.2012); Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 07-cv-1302, 882 F.Supp.2d 7 (D.D.C. Mar.30, 2012), 2012 WL 1059700 ; Estate of Brown v. … .); Estate of Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 08-cv-531, 872 F.Supp.2d 37 , 2012 WL 2562368 (D.D.C.2012) (Lamberth, C.J.); Fain v.

United States v. Wyche

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2023

No. 101- 647, § 1002(c), 104 Stat. 4827; United States v. Brown, 16 F.3d 423,426 n.3 (D.C. … Williams-Davis, No. 91-cr-559-1 (TFH), ECF No. 2376; Order, United States v. Board, No. 91-cr-559-11 (TFH), ECF No. 2344. A comparison of Mr.

Newborn v. National Government Services Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2015

) TERRY NEWBORN, ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V. … Date: January 27, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Sheppard v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Jackson v. Bessent

District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Bancoult v. McNamara

370 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2004

In November 2002, the plaintiffs moved for leave to amend their complaint to reinstate DCDM and add Brown & Root as defendants. … Powell v.

Rhodes v. United States Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2025

Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1993); see also Carpenters Indus. Council v. Salazar, 734 F. Supp. 2d 126, 132 (D.D.C. 2010); Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, 560 F. Supp. 2d 21, 23 (D.D.C. 2008). … See Borud v. Emmert, No. 24-1211-TNM, 2025 WL 894417, at *3 (D.D.C.

Abramowitz v. Lake

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2025

Ass’n v. … Morrison v.

Epps v. U.S. Attorney General

575 F. Supp. 2d 232 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2008

Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “A complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4. … See Morrissey v.

Aug v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

425 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1976

See, NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 , 95 S.Ct. 1504 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975); Renegotiation Board v. … Board, and contained in Board minutes.

L. J. Christopher Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner

55 F.2d 530 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 1931

It was held in United Thacker Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. … To the same effect are: Trustees for The Ohio & Big Sandy Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 43 F.(2d) 782 ; Pantages Theater Co. v. Lucas (C. C. A.) 42 F.(2d) 810 ; Greylock Mills v. Commissioner (C. C.

Lebron v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

585 F. Supp. 1461 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1984

Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 50-53 , 96 S.Ct. 612, 650-51 , 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976). However, “[untruthful speech, commercial or otherwise, has never been protected for its own sake.” Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See, e.g., Tomei v.

NMI Systems, Inc. v. Pillard (In Re NMI Systems, Inc.)

179 B.R. 357 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1995

Brown-stein, a member of the board of directors. Brownstein wrote to Dramis on May 6,1991, raising questions about the bonus plan and stock options included in the offer letter. … See also Herm v.

Tennekoon v. Fanning

156 F. Supp. 3d 208 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2016

Albino v. United States, 78 F. Supp. 3d 148, 167 (D.D.C. 2015), citing Frizelle, 111 F.3d at 177; see also Rudo v. Geren, 818 F. … See Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 539 (D.C.

Caldwell v. ARGOSY UNIVERSITY

797 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 2011

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977). Caldwell’s claim against the government must be dismissed because his complaint does not comply with Rule 8(a). … (Gov’t Reply at 2 (citing Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499 ).)