Case law

In re C.L.D.

739 A.2d 353 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1999

See Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1019 (D.C.1991) (citing In re D.J., 532 A.2d 138, 141 (D.C.1982)). … See Wisconsin v.

Dyer v. D.C. Department of Housing & Community Development

452 A.2d 968 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1982

Gibson v. City of Oberlin, 171 Ohio St. 1 , 167 N.E.2d 651 , 653-54 (1960). See also Smith v. Winhall Planning Commission, 140 Vt. 178 , 436 A.2d 760 (1981); Union Oil Company of California v. … City of Worthington, 62 Ohio St.2d 263 , 405 N.E.2d 277 (1980); Board of Zoning App., City of Ft. Wayne v. *971 Shell Oil Co., 164 Ind.App. 497 , 329 N.E.2d 636 (1975); 16 C.J.S.

District of Columbia v. Square 345 Associates Ltd. Partnership

706 A.2d 574 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1998

Partnership v. District of Columbia, 466 A.2d 857 (D.C.1983). … The trial judge, relying on language found in District of Columbia v.

Adams v. United States

502 A.2d 1011 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1986

Adams v. United States, 466 A.2d 439 , 443 n. 3 (D.C.1983); Poteat v. United States, 363 A.2d 295, 296 (D.C.1976) (per curiam); Brown v. United States, 244 A.2d 487, 489 (D.C.1968); Gilmore v. … Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684 , 100 S.Ct. 1432 , 63 L.Ed.2d 715 (1980); Garris I, 465 A.2d at 823 ; Brown v. United States, 464 A.2d 120 , 125 n. 7 (D.C.1983); Harling v.

Goldsmith v. Tapper

748 A.2d 416 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2000

The “fake” returns had been delivered to Goldsmith by Tapper in a plain brown envelope. … Abebe v. Benitez, 667 A.2d 834, 836 (D.C.1995); see Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Jones, 443 A.2d 45, 49 (D.C.1982) (en banc); Corley v. BP Oil Corp., 402 A.2d 1258, 1263 (D.C.1979).

Howard v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2026

Baliles v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. … See, e.g., Miranda v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp.

Patrick v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2025

See Neil v. … See Green v.

Douglas v. United States

859 A.2d 641 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2004

Adams v. United States, 558 A.2d 348, 349 (D.C.1989). … Larry Douglas boarded a Metro bus heading southbound on Georgia Avenue to go to work. He was already a little late and anxious to begin his day. The bus driver, later identified as Mr.

Ohio Valley Construction Co., Inc. v. Dew

354 A.2d 518 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1976

For example, in Engle v. … ABCD Corp. v. Henry, D.C.Mun.App., 109 A.2d 133 (1954); Donovan v. Brown, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 124 F.2d 295 (1941). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. So ordered. 1 .

Nunley v. Nunley

210 A.2d 12 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1965

In Gordon v. Matthews, 106 U.S. … See Downie v. Pritchard, 309 F.2d 634 (8th Cir. 1962); Commercial Solvents Corp. v. Jasspon, 92 F.Supp. 20 (S.D.N.Y.1950). 5 . Citing Schreiber v. Sharpless, 110 U.S. 76 , 3 S.Ct. 423 , 28 L.Ed. 65 (1884) and Gerling v.

Coles v. United States

682 A.2d 167 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1996

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (plurality opinion). See also Brinegar v. … See, e.g., United States v. Bolden, 429 A.2d 185, 186 (D.C. 1981); Tobias v. United States, 375 A.2d 491, 492-94 (D.C.1977); Munn v. United States, 283 A.2d 28, 30-31 (D.C.1971); Peterkin v.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

506 A.2d 1127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1986

See Lorillard v. … Police & Firefighters Retirement and Relief Board, 465 A.2d 364, 366 (D.C.1983) (great weight given to reasonable agency construction of statute it administers).

Joyce v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

741 A.2d 24 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1999

Management v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 496 A.2d 264, 265 (D.C.1985), and failure to appeal in time deprives the RHC of jurisdiction. See 14 DCMR § 8816.6; Smith v. … Cf McDaniels v. Brown, 740 A.2d 551 (D.C.1999) (demand for trial de novo in arbitration case was untimely where appellant waited more than fifteen days after actual receipt of arbitrator’s decision to file demand).

Spring Valley — Wesley Heights Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

856 A.2d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2004

This “2000 Campus Plan” replaced the “1989 Campus Plan” that the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) had approved more than a decade earlier, in 1990. See Glenbrook Rd. Ass’n v. … See Foggy Bottom Ass’n v.

United States v. Scott

269 A.2d 444 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1970

See United States v. Nolan, 413 F.2d 850, 853-854 (6th Cir. 1969). … United States v. Ravich, 421 F.2d 1196, 1201-1202 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v.

Clinton Turner v. United States

166 A.3d 949 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 2017

Hinton v. Alabama, 134 S. … See Tindle v.

Fair Care Foundation, A.G. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance & Securities Regulation

716 A.2d 987 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1998

Quick v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 331 A.2d 319, 323 (D.C.1975); see American Trucking Assn’s v. Frisco Transp. … Id. at n. 7; see Cheek v.

Blango v. United States

373 A.2d 885 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1977

See Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 43 , 46, 365 F.2d 976, 979 (1966). … State v. Essman, 98 Ariz. 228 , 403 P.2d 540 (1965); People v. Ireland, 70 Cal.2d 522 , 75 Cal.Rptr. 188 , 450 P.2d 580 (1969); State v. Clark, 204 Kan. 38 , 460 P.2d 586 (1969); State v.

Bennett v. United States

26 A.3d 745 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2011

Brown v. … See Joseph v.

McCray v. McGee

504 A.2d 1128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1986

State, 335 So.2d 815, 817 (Fla.1976); Shapiro v. Essex County Board of Chosen Freeholders, 177 N.J.Super. 87, 94 , 424 A.2d 1203, 1207 (1980); Patrolmen’s Benevolent Ass’n v. … Elliott v. Roach, 409 N.E.2d 661, 666 (Ind.App.1980) (court did not apply general rule because statute specifically included both “counterclaim” and “cross-claim”). The decision in 1425 F Street Corp. v.