Case law

Gardiner v. District of Columbia

499 A.2d 455 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1985

See, e.g., Shimer v. Edwards, 482 A.2d 399, 400 (D.C.1984). We review the court’s imposition of Rule 37 sanctions under the abuse of discretion standard. See, e.g., Pollock v. Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52 (D.C.1978). … See, e.g., United States v. U.S.

Johnson v. United States

613 A.2d 888 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1992

Appellant returned the iron to the ironing board as Townes ran downstairs to the front door in an attempt to escape. … See Kelly v.

District of Columbia v. Powers Gallery, Inc.

335 A.2d 244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1975

District of Columbia v. … The approach toward the personal property tax statute taken in Tumulty was restated with approval in Brown v. Collector of Taxes for District of Columbia, 101 U.

Campbell v. United States

65 A.2d 191 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1949

S. 595 , 44 S.Ct. 453 , 68 L.Ed. 867 ; Bowser v. Tobin, 215 Ind. 99 , 18 N.E.2d 773 ; Smith v. Robertson, 155 Kan. 706 , 128 P.2d 260 ; Freimann v. Gallmeier, 116 Ind.App. 170 , 63 N.E.2d 150 . … State v. Superior Court, 49 Wash. 1 , 94 P. 665 , 17 L.R.A.,N.S., 257; Ex parte Murphy, 79 Cal.App. 64 , 248 P. 1044 ; People v. Browning, 132 Cal.App. 136 , 22 P.2d 784 ; Miller v.

Savage v. Burgess

71 A.3d 718 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2013

Hawes v. Chua, 769 A.2d 797, 806 (D.C.2001) (emphasis added); see also Hill v. … Appellees’ reliance on this court’s opinion in Nwaneri v. Sandidge, 931 A.2d 466, 475 (D.C.2007), is misplaced.

Thomas v. United States

447 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1982

See Kotteakos v. United States, supra; Simmons v. United States, supra; Coombs v. United States, supra; Hayes v. … Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 388 A.2d 451 (1978). In Brown , the trial court had concluded that the missing witness was not peculiarly available to the government since he could have been subpoenaed by the defense.

AFGE v. D.C. Water & Sewer

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2024

In Atchison v. … See Wong v.

In re Moawad

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2022

In doing so we accept the factual findings and aggravating circumstances of the state of Maryland, as described in Attorney Grievance Commission v. … See, e.g., In re Bynum, 197 A.3d 1072, 1074 (D.C. 2018) (court accepted the Board’s findings and conclusion that respondent’s multiple violations rose to flagrant dishonesty absent a lack of an attempt to fraudulent obtain

Hamilton v. Hojeij Branded Food, Inc.

41 A.3d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2012

V.C.B. v. United States, 37 A.3d 286, 291 (D.C.2012) (quoting Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1990)). … The Board has adopted regulations that define gross and simple misconduct with examples of each.

In Re Stasson

987 A.2d 1143 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2010

On consideration of the order of the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board suspending respondent for a period of four years, with reinstatement conditioned on respondent's showing of fitness to practice law, and directing payment … of restitution and costs, see Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Comm'n v.

Campbell v. United States

174 A.2d 87 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1961

Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 , 67 S.Ct. 385, 393 , 91 L.Ed. 451, 402 . 3 . See Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217 , 80 S.Ct. 683 , 4 L.Ed.2d 668 ; Ellison v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 206 F.2d 476 . … Cf., Williams v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 170 A.2d 233 .

James v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 2024

Brown v. … Germany v.

In Re Herman

594 A.2d 533 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1991

See Williams v. … Stevens, 39 Misc.2d 712 , 241 N.Y.S.2d 497 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1963), aff’d, 20 A.D.2d 896 , 249 N.Y.S.2d 668 (1964); James v. Brown, 637 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.1982); see abo J.

Bailey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

499 A.2d 1223 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1985

Id. at 465 (citing Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 484 A.2d 956, 958 (D.C.1984)). … (citing Thomas v.

Sessoms-Deloatch v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2020

See M.A.P. v. … While we had previously held to the contrary, 5 Smith acknowledged that intervening 5 Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56, 61 n.2 (D.C. 2002); Littlejohn v.

Malz v. Fox

42 App. D.C. 560 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1914

The Board awarded all the claims to Fox. … Arbetter v. Lewis, 34 App. D. C. 491. The decision will he affirmed as to claims 1, 2, and 5, and reversed as to claims 3 and 4.

Secor v. Charles H. Tompkins Co.

45 A.2d 117 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1946

Brown Lumber Co. v. … Co., 243 U.S. 281 , 37 S.Ct. 287 , 61 L.Ed. 722 ; Grissinger v. United States, 77 Ct.Cl. 106 ; Lyon v. Robert Garrett Lumber Co., 77 Kan. 823 , 92 P. 589 . International Co. v.

Rudolph v. Peters

35 App. D.C. 438 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1910

. *446 In Brown v. … In Johnson v. Thomas, 23 App. D.

Ziegler v. Ziegler

304 A.2d 13 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1973

As we said in a similar case, Mazur v. … The court relied upon Alves v. Alves, D.C. App., 262 A.2d 111 (1970), for its finding of jurisdiction to make the custody award.

Henderson v. Allison

44 A.2d 220 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1945

Viner v. Friedman, D.C.Mun.App., 33 A.2d 631 ; Yellow Cab Co. v. Griffith, D.C.Mun. App., 40 A.2d 340 . 3. … Donovan v. Brown, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 124 F.2d 295 . 4. Appellant complains of a part of the charge to the jury, in which the judge discussed the relationship between Mrs.