Case law

District of Columbia v. American Federation of State Employees, District Council 20

81 A.3d 299 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2013

Andrews v. … PERB also distinguished the Supreme Court case AT & T Technologies, Inc. v.

Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order)

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2018

District of Columbia Court of Appeals FEB 91 238 ozai“azz“o;:ooz_t; _ No. 16-AA-1091 " " C-JUWW *"PPEA%SA I<;ATARINA STRAUGHN, Petitioner, v. CRB?I-IG D.C. … ORDERED that the motion to publish the memorandum opinion and judgment is granted, and the C}erk Shail issue the attached opinion forthwith PER CURIAM_ No. 16-AA-109l Copies to: Timothy Fitzpatrick Compensation Review Board

Howard v. United States

929 A.2d 839 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 2007

Id., 528 U.S. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)). … As this court noted in Thomas , prior to the Supreme Court’s holding in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), our decision in Brown v.

Dilbeck v. Murphy

502 A.2d 466 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1985

See Dillard v. … Brown v. Lamb, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 314 , 315 & n. 2, 414 F.2d 1210 , 1211 & n. 2 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 904 , 25 L.Ed.2d 88 (1970) (construing D.C.Code § 28-3504 (1967)).

ANDRE v. FISHER, JR. v. GORDON L. LATNEY

146 A.3d 88 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2016

(Marcus) Brown v. United States, 59 A.3d 967, 974 (D.C.2013). As we have noted, every jury poll has an inescapable element of coercion. … (Marcus) Brown, 59 A.3d at 974 ; see also Smith v.

Eisenberg v. Eisenberg

357 A.2d 396 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1976

McGehee v. Maxfield, D.C.App., 256 A.2d 576 (1969). See also Marlowe v. Marlowe, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 59 (1973). … The two boys were sent to boarding school in New York during the 1973-74 academic year. 4 . The trial court held that because Mr.

Keener v. Karr

528 A.2d 1236 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1987

See, e.g., Young v. … Brown, 669 F.2d 516, 525 (8th Cir.1982) (same); Hahn v. Becker, 588 F.2d 768, 771 (7th Cir.1979) (same); Calcagni v. Hudson Waterways Corp., 603 F.2d 1049, 1051-52 (2nd Cir.1979) (same). In Ryen v.

Konecny v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

447 A.2d 31 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1982

Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 648 F.2d 1239 , 1245 n. 9 (9th Cir. 1981). See also Brandon v. Board of Education of Guilderland Central School District, 635 F.2d 971, 978 (2d Cir. 1980). … In describing the situations in which the three-part test is to be applied, the Supreme Court cited Board of Education v.

Jaime v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

486 A.2d 692 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1985

On appeal, the Office of Appeals and Review affirmed the appeals examiner’s conclusions of law. 2 Respondent now cites Vedder v. … Accord, Zubritsky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 202 Pa. Super. 347 , 195 A.2d 854, 855 (1963).

United States v. Speed

388 A.2d 892 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1978

Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 834, 835 (1970). See also United States v. Hayes, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 701 (1970). … See Nance v.

Maryam Ashrafi v. Leonardo D. Fernandez

193 A.3d 129 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2018

See Arbaugh v. … Brown v.

Ruffin v. Trans-Lux Theatre

156 A.2d 678 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1959

Brown v. Capital Transit Co., 75 U.S.App.D.C. 337 , 127 F.2d 329 , certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 632 , 63 S.Ct. 61 , 87 L.Ed. 510 . To the same effect is Reece v. Capital Transit Co., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 274 , 230 F.2d 824 . … Burg v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 7 Cir., 256 F.2d 613 ; Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Wedgeworth, 5 Cir., 252 F.2d 759 . See also Scott v. United States, D.C.N.D.N.Y., 158 F. Supp. 810 .

Graves v. United States

515 A.2d 1136 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1986

Christian v. City of Kansas City, 710 S.W.2d 11, 12 (Mo.Ct.App.1986); see Brown v. Municipality of Anchorage, 584 P.2d 35, 36-37 (Alaska 1978); Profit v. City of Tulsa, 617 P.2d 250, 251 (Okla.Crim.App. 1980). … See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) (presence in drug trafficking area does not create reasonable suspicion for Terry stop); cf. Kolender v.

Drake v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 30, 2024

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 30 (1968); see Brown v. United States, __ A.3d __, No. 22-CF-0520, 2024 WL 1665328, at *3 (D.C. Apr. 18, 2024). “The requirement of articulable suspicion is not an onerous one.” … (quoting Katz, 285 A.3d at 1303) (alterations in Brown)); id.

Rustler Construction, Inc. v. District of Columbia

211 A.3d 187 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2019

Co. v. United States, 64 Fed. Cl. 229, 240 (2005). … See Kinetic Builder’s Inc. v. Peters, 226 F.3d 1307, 1317-18 (Fed.

Howard University v. Best

484 A.2d 958 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1984

Brown & Root, Inc., 736 F.2d 1202 (8th Cir.1984) (quoting M.B.M. Co. v. … For example, in Soni v. Board of Trustees, supra, 513 F.2d 347 , Dr.

Matter of LJ

546 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1988

We have stressed before that crime prevention is "a weighty social objective," Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 207 , 338 F.2d 543, 547 (1964); Smith v. United States, 392 A.2d 990, 993 (D.C.1978).

Carle v. United States

705 A.2d 682 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1998

the statute is that the Board of Judges may lift the exclusion after one year (but not less) or later, as it sees fit. … See Peoples Drug Stores v.

In re American Circular Loom Co.

28 App. D.C. 446 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1906

Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 311, 322 , 20 L. ed. 581, 583; Lawrence Mfg. Co. v. Tennessee Mfg. Co. 138 U. S. 537, 547 , 34 L. ed. 997, 1003, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 396. … See also Putnam Nail Co. v. Dulaney, 140 Pa. 205 , 11 L.R.A. 524 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 228 , 21 Atl. 391 ; Mumm v. Kirk, 40 Fed. 589 . Dor the reasons given, the decision will be affirmed.

Tribble v. AMERICAN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. OF BOSTON

277 A.2d 659 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 1971

Royal Credit Co., Inc. v. Mas Marques, D.C.App., 222 A.2d 70, 71 (1966). … Emmco Insurance Co. v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 178 A.2d 429 (1962). Affirmed. 1 . Former G.S.Civ.Rule 60(b) (6) reads: (b) Mistake; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud; Etc.