The opinion
District of Columbia
Court of Appeals FEB 91 238
ozai“azz“o;:ooz_t; _
No. 16-AA-1091 " " C-JUWW *"PPEA%SA
I<;ATARINA STRAUGHN,
Petitioner,
v. CRB?I-IG
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
(WORKER’ S COMPENSATION),
Respondent,
and
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN
AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
Intervenor.
BEFORE: Biackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge; McLeese, Associate Judge and Nebeker,
Senior lodge
0 R D E R
On consideration appellant’s motion to publish, and intervenor’S opposition, it is
ORDERED that the motion to publish the memorandum opinion and judgment is
granted, and the C}erk Shail issue the attached opinion forthwith
PER CURIAM_
No. 16-AA-109l
Copies to:
Timothy Fitzpatrick
Compensation Review Board
4058 Minnesota Avenue, NE
Suite 4005
Washington, DC 20019
Copies e»served to:
Krsita N. DeSmyter, Esquire
7852 Waiker Drive
Suite 300
Greenbelt, MD 20770
Mark H. Dho, Esquire
Sarah O. Rollman, Esquire
Oft`ice of General Counsef
Washington Metropolitan Are 'Transit authority
600 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 200}
Loron L. Alikhan, Esquire
Acting Soficitor General for DC
441 4‘]‘ Street, NW
Suite 6008
Washington, DC 20001