Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

0.89s

  • In Re Youmans

    617 A.2d 534 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1993

    Before us is a report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be disbarred both on the basis of the imposition of reciprocal discipline under D.C.Bar R. … The Board noted further that New Jersey courts have described the offense covered by the theft by deception statute as one involving fraud, State v. Rodgers, 230 N.J.Super. 593 , 554 A.2d 866, 870 (App.Div.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. Green

    310 A.2d 848 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1973

    As the Circuit Court said in Tumulty v. … See, e. g., Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 62 L.Ed. 1154 (1918); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307 , 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971) ; Carkonen v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Bagenstose v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals

    888 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2005

    See Stevens v. Quick, 678 A.2d 28, 31 (D.C.1996). We conclude that the trial court did not err in affirming the Board’s decision that Ba-genstose’s retirement was voluntary. … Keyes v. District of Columbia, 362 U.S.App. D.C. 67, 72, 372 F.3d 434, 439 (2004); Covington v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 750 F.2d 937, 941 (Fed.Cir.1984); Christie v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Zanders v. United States

    999 A.2d 149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2010

    See Perez v. … Brown-Robinson had known appellant for four years.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Harris v. District of Columbia

    991 A.2d 1199 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2010

    Brown, supra note 3, 795 A.2d at 62 (citation omitted). … R. 35(a) ("The Court may correct an illegal sentence at any time....”); Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. England

    185 A.2d 726 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1962

    LaForest v. Board of Commissioners, 67 App.D.C. 306 , 92 F.2d 547 , cert. denied, 302 U.S. 760 , 58 S.Ct. 367 , 82 L.Ed. 5S8; Ritch v. Director of' Vehicles & Traffic of D. of C., D.C.Mun.App., 124 A.2d 301 . 3 . … See Blakey v. Board of Com’rs of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 177 A.2d 269 . 4 . Jones v. Board of Control, Fla., 131 So.2d 713 ; People v. Salmon, 148 Cal. 303 , 83 P. 42 , 2 L.R.A.,N.S., 1186.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    825 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 29, 2003

    Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791 (D.C.1997); see also Harris v. … See Short v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Garvey v. O'DONOGHUE

    530 A.2d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1987

    Salgo v. Leland Stanford University Board of Trustees, supra note 7, 317 P.2d at 180, 154 Cal.App.2d at 576. … Smith, supra, 318 A.2d at 893 ; Brown v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 134 , 142, 375 F.2d 310, 318 (1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 915 , 87 S.Ct. 2133 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1359 (1967); Smith v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. United States

    662 A.2d 1368 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1995

    See, e.g., Earle v. United States, 612 A.2d 1258, 1265 (D.C.1992); Burnette v. United States, 600 A.2d 1082, 1083 (D.C.1991); see also Brown v. … Earle, supra, 612 A.2d at 1265 ; Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 394 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Capital View Realty Company v. Cohen

    124 A.2d 853 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1956

    In the case we have here it is-enough to say, as the Supreme Court *857 said in Lawson v. … Sigler v. Callan, D.C.Mun.App., 121 A.2d 268 . 4 . See also Weimann v. Sheppard, D.C.Mun.App., 37 A.2d 847 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Jones

    534 A.2d 336 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1987

    Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108 , 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972); accord, e.g., United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 , 74 S.Ct. 808, 812 , 98 L.Ed. 989 (1954); Lanzetta v. … See Howell v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. Savoy Construction Co.

    515 A.2d 698 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1986

    This court applies the Wunderlich Act standards of judicial review to factual determinations by the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board. District of Columbia v. Heman Ward, Inc., 261 A.2d 836, 838 (D.C.1970). . … See, e.g., Kehm Corp. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Greater Washington Business Center v. D.C. Commission on Human Rights

    454 A.2d 1333 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1982

    See Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979); Spevak v. … See Proulx v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 430 A.2d 34, 35 (1981); Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, supra at 192.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In re Harris-Smith

    772 A.2d 804 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 2001

    Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Bridgette Harris Smith, 356 Md. 72 , 737 A.2d 567 (1999). As a result, we temporarily suspended respondent by order of October 7, 1999. … The Board does not recommend any additional reciprocal discipline based on the Maryland suspension.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hazel v. United States

    516 A.2d 944 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1986

    We affirm. 1 Appellant’s claim is precluded by our recent decision in District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. District of Columbia, 509 A.2d 609 (D.C.1986). … Id. at 614 ; see also District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984); Convention Center Referendum Committee v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re McConnell

    502 A.2d 454 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1985

    The matter came before the Board for argument on September 13, 1984. … Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709, 1711 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Darden v. CAPITOL CAB COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, INC.

    154 A.2d 352 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1959

    But neither the membership nor the board took any steps to notify the plaintiff of such action, as he continued to serve as attorney for the association. … National Tire Dealers & Retreaders Ass’n v. G. D. C. Corp., D.C.Mun.App., 147 A.2d 869, 871.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kasachkoff v. ROSS H. FINN CO., INC.

    408 A.2d 993 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1979

    Jones v. Hunt, supra [D.C.App., 298 A.2d 220 ]; Westmoreland v. Weaver Brothers, Inc., D.C.App., 295 A.2d 506 (1972); Barr v. Rhea Radin Real Estate, Inc., D.C.App., 251 A.2d 634 (1969). … Brown v. Brown, D.C.App., 343 A.2d 59 (1975). 6 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Neighborhood Legal Services Program v. MF RYAN

    276 A.2d 728 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1971

    Morrow v. District of Columbia, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 160, 168 , 417 F.2d 728, 736 (1969); United States v. Kronheim, D.C.Mun.App., 80 A.2d 280, 282 (1951). In view of our holding in Borden v. … See Brown v. Fauntleroy, D.C.Cir., 442 F.2d 838 at 842 (Decided Feb. 26, 1971). So ordered. * Now the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. 1 . D.C.Code 1967, § 16-918.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rouse v. United States

    402 A.2d 1218 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 23, 1979

    Peggy Brown, who worked in the office, testified that she had seen a man (Clay) run across the field, and that she “had heard something like gunshots.” … While Clay and Brown waited for the police, they watched appellant remove packages from the truck and drop them over a nearby embankment for approximately five minutes.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.