Case law

In Re Gallagher

886 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2005

See In re Shieh, 738 A.2d 814, 816-17 (D.C.1999); Jerome Mgmt. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 682 A.2d 178, 183 (D.C.1996). … See, e.g., Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Here, respondent has not argued defects in notice.

In Re Day

717 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1998

Bar Counsel agrees with the Board's recommendation. … See Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 378-79 , 91 S.Ct. 780 , 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971). However, it is well established that an individual can waive any process to which he or she has a right. See D.H. Overmyer Co. v.

In Re Barneys

861 A.2d 1270 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2004

Maryland Rule 16-701(e); see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Barneys, 370 Md. 566 , 805 A.2d 1040 (2002) {Barneys I). … We reject these arguments and accept the Board’s recommendation. I.

Johnson v. United States

683 A.2d 1087 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1996

The apartment doubled as the production center of the narcotics ring and a home for three persons, Carrington’s son, Carrington’s girlfriend, Crystal Brown, and Brown’s younger brother. … See Ford v.

Blackledge v. United States

447 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1982

United States v. … But see Brock v.

Kennedy v. Real Estate Commission

202 A.2d 774 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1964

Functions transferred to the Board of Commissioners. — There are hereby transferred to the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia * * * all functions of the following named offices and agencies of the Government … Then on September 19, 1963, the Board of Commissioners amended Part V, Section E, of Reorganization Order No. 59 to state: “E.

United States v. Brannon

404 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1979

E. g., Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 349 A.2d 467, 468 (1975). … Our concern is illustrated by Brown v.

Weaver Bros. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

473 A.2d 384 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1984

Brown that because of the RHC’s action, his rent would rise from $406 to $447 a month beginning on May 1, 1981. Five months remained in Mr. Brown’s 1-year lease term. … Williams v.

District of Columbia v. Metropolitan Railroad

8 App. D.C. 322 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1896

The case of State v. Winona, 21 Minn. 472 , and State v. Southern Minn. … And Brooks v. Railway Co., 101 U. S. 443 , and Meyer v. Hornby, 101 U.

Konvalinka v. United States

162 A.2d 778 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1960

v. … United States, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 231 F.2d 244 ; Brown v. United States, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 270 , 152 F.2d 138 .

Ricciardi v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 2026

Ass’n v. … See Niblock v.

Washington Teachers' Union v. District of Columbia Public Schools

960 A.2d 1123 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2008

Davis v. United States, 564 A.2d 31, 35 (D.C.1989). 11 . Armstead v. District of Columbia, 810 A.2d 398, 400 (D.C.2002) (quoting Grillo v. District of Columbia, 731 A.2d 384, 386 (D.C. 1999) and Taggart-Wilson v. … (quoting King v. Kidd, 640 A.2d 656, 664 (D.C.1993)). 17 . District of Columbia v. The Sierra Club, 670 A.2d 354, 358 (D.C.1996) (citing Simpson v.

In Re Devaney

870 A.2d 53 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2005

PER CURIAM: The District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends that this court find that respondent, William B. … client’s estate); In re Olson, 358 N.W.2d 662 (Minn.1984) (attorney disbarred for using power of attorney to draft documents leaving his comatose sister-in-law’s entire estate to himself); Comm. on Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v.

Wright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

924 A.2d 284 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 2007

Wright argues that the Compensation Review Board (“Review Board”) erroneously applied our decision in Estate of Underwood v. … Bank, FSB v.

In re Kelly

816 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2003

XI, §§ 10(c) and 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). … Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelly, 565 Pa. 254 , 772 A.2d 955 (2001). .In re Rosenbleet, 592 A.2d 1036 (D.C.1991). .

In Re Cornish

691 A.2d 156 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1997

Comm’n v. Samuels, 328 Md. 739 , 616 A.2d 903 (1992). The Maryland order before us placing respondent on inactive status does not include any such explicit condition, Attorney Griev. Comm’n v. … Comm’n v. Dick, 340 Md. 28 , 664 A.2d 1263 (1995), Attorney Griev. Comm’n v. Clancy, 336 Md. 516 , 649 A.2d 356 (1994), and Attorney Griev. Comm’n v.

Prince v. United States

825 A.2d 928 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2003

See Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021, 1022 (D.C.1991) (reasonable suspicion); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008,1020 (D.C. 1991) (probable cause). … United States v. Brown, 150 U.S.App. D.C. 113, 114, 463 F.2d 949, 950 (1972) (emphasis in original; citations omitted). 8 .

District of Columbia v. Keyes

362 A.2d 729 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1976

Board of Finance and Revenue, 409 Pa. 180 , 185 A.2d 542 (1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 958 , 83 S.Ct. 1015 , 10 L.Ed.2d 12 (1963); Calvert Distillers Corp. v. … Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476 , 103 A.2d 668 (1954). 8 .

In Re Saul

671 A.2d 461 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 1996

V 1993), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. United States v. Saul, No. 93-0108-0001 (E.D.Va. Sept. 3, 1993). … But then, in October 1995, respondent withdrew his exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation, thereby withdrawing as well any objection contained in his earlier filed briefs.

In Re Chasnoff

827 A.2d 808 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Chasnoff, 366 Md. 250 , 783 A.2d 224 (2001). … XI, § 11(d), 1 and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline in the form of a ninety-day suspension with a fitness requirement.