Case law

Carrier Corp. v. United States

328 F.2d 328 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1964

This is in accordance with my concurring opinion in the cases of John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 881 , 325 F. 2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 931 (1964), and Brown & Son Electric Co. v.

Boehm v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 142 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1885

Considered simply as a matter of legal right, the law is undoubtedly that which was laid down by Chief Justice Gibson in Archer v. … (Brown’s Case, 6 C. Cls. R., 171 .) When the Act 3d March, 1863 (12 Stat.

Travelers Insurance v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 758 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1983

Paul and Pacific R.R. v. … In contrast, see Proctor Wholesale Co. v.

Franco-Italian Packing Co. v. United States

128 F. Supp. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

Irwin & Co. v. United States, 24 Ct.Cl. 187 ; United States v. Irwin, 127 U.S. 125 , 8 S.Ct. 1033 , 32 L.Ed. 99 ; Graham v. United States, supra; United States v. Carver, 278 U.S. 294 , 49 S.Ct. 100 , 73 L.Ed. 387 . … Irwin & Co. v. United States (Perry v. United States), 24 Ct.Cl. 187 .

Atkins v. United States

14 F. Supp. 288 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1936

In Rogers v. … Harrington, 1 B.T.A. 11 ; Fridolin Pabst v. Com’r of Internal Revenue, 6 B.T. A. 843; Harry J. Gutman v. Com’r of Internal Revenue, 7 B.T.A. 500 .” In Dalton et al. v.

Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

4 F. Supp. 113 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1933

In Brown v. Leo (C. C. … Board of Com’rs of Shawnee Co., Kan. v. Hurley (C. C. A.) 169 F. 92 [supra]; Sexton v. Dreyfus and Sexton v. Lloyds Bank, 219 U. S. 339 , 31 S. Ct. 256 , 55 L. Ed. 244 [supra].

Farwell Co. v. United States

148 F. Supp. 947 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

Pipe-Fittings; Bronze (Screwed), 125-Pound and 250-Pound. »f* $ V V ■I’ *843 WW-T-797. Tubing; Copper, Seamless (for General Use with I. P. S. Flanged Fittings). WW-T-799. … After a hearing, the Corps of Engineers Claims and Appeals Board rendered a decision denying the appeal. The decision of the Claims and Appeals Board is quoted in part as follows: .

National School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. United States

142 F. Supp. 933 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

Bergh, et al. v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 564 , originated this practice, so far as we can recall. In neither that case nor this should the witness have been tendered, or the testimony admitted. … The plaintiff’s claim has been the subject of administrative consideration by the Veterans’ Education Appeals Board, a new Board created by Public Law 610 and appointed by the President, and by the Veterans’ Administration

Basic Inc. v. United States

549 F.2d 740 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977

[Gregory v. Helvering, supra, 293 U.S. at 469 .] … Steel Improvement & Forge Co. v. Commissioner, 314 F. 2d 96, 98 (6th Cir. 1963); Commissioner v.

Airco, Inc. v. United States

504 F.2d 1133 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

Aireo did not appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. … In this respect the case is the same as Nolan Bros. v. United States, supra; Clement Bros. v. United States, supra; and William Green Constr. Co. v.

Matson v. United States

171 F. Supp. 283 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

See Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment, 347 U.S. 590, 594 , 74 S.Ct. 757 , 98 L.Ed. 967 . Now our Declaration of Policy in the Act of 1958 reads: “Sec. 103. … J. v. Eastern Airlines, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 750, 760 ; Dick v. United States, Ct.Cl., 169 F.Supp. 491 . 9 . Highland Park, Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 161 F.Supp. 597 ; Herring v.

West Virginia v. United States

45 Ct. Cl. 576 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 21, 1910

As a local auditing board under the act of the legislature in question the said board did not deal with muster rolls in the place of authorized rolls claimed to have ever been lost. … (Williams v. United States, 22 C. Cls. R., 116 .)

Continental Baking Co. v. United States

11 F. Supp. 143 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1935

Co. v. United States, 46 F.(2d) 592 , 71 Ct. … The case of Helvering v. Morgan’s, Inc., 293 U. S. 121 , 55 S. Ct. 60 , 79 L.

Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United States

73 Ct. Cl. 508 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1932

United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co., *521 v. S. 234; Hollerbach v. United States, 233 U. S. 165 ; Spearin v. United States, 248 U. S. 132 . … The board’s determination settled any compensation due on this account.

Alvarez v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 311 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1985

As to creditable service see Cubacub v. … See Abadilla v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 838 (1982); Menchavez v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 924 (1982); Caiyod v. United States, 231 Ct. Cl. 1004 (1982); DeGuzman v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 1005 (1982).

Sharp

566 F.2d 1190 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1977

De-Tom Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 362 , 552 F.2d 337 (1977). … Trone v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 671 (1977).

Weed v. United States

157 F. Supp. 948 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1958

See e. g., True v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 662 ; Doyle v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 491 ; Brown v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 427 .

Bryant & Detwiler Co. v. United States

50 F.2d 481 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

A. 15, being the same ease when it was heard before the board, and also by Appeal of Moore Investment Co., 2 B. T. … We do not find it necessary to determine whether the case of Belfast Investment Co. v. Commissioner, 17 B. T.

Louden Machinery Co. v. United States

57 F.2d 911 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1932

In January, 1925, more than two years after these interest-bearing- notes liad been canceled and the interest collected in cash, or by notes, the board of director's of plaintiff company passed a resolution directing- that … See Northwestern Cabinet Company v. Commissioner, 13 B. T. A. 533, and Dieckerhoff, Raffloer & Co. v. Commissioner, 17 B. T. A. 1251.

Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg & Dampskibsselskabet Af 1912 Artieselskab v. United States

130 F. Supp. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

Under article 6 (a) the owner agreed to pay for un-broached consumable stores, fresh water and bunkers on board the vessels at the time of delivery, and the Administrator agreed to deliver all spare parts on board the vessels … Lynch v. United States, 292 U. S. 571 ; Perry v. United States, 294 U. S. 330 ; Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 272 .