Opinion

Carrier Corp. v. United States

  • 328 F.2d 328
  • 164 Ct. Cl. 666
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Feb 14, 1964
Status
Published
Author
Laramore
On the bench
Davis, Dureee, Jones, Laramore, Whitaker
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.6%

The opinion

Laramore, Judge,

concurring:

I concur with the ma j ority’s conclusion that plaintiff should recover on the basis of the majority opinion. I also concur with the majority that a supplemental agreement resulted. However, I would prefer that plaintiff’s damages should be *684 measured under the clause of the contract which provides for a termination for the convenience of the Government. This is in accordance with my concurring opinion in the cases of John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 881 , 325 F. 2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 931 (1964), and Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 465 , 325 F. 2d 446 (1963).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.