Case law

United States v. Sanders

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 28, 2023

Pisciotta v. Teledyne Industries, Inc., 91 9 || F.3d 1326, 1331 (9th Cir. 1996). Although the rule should be interpreted with extreme 10 || liberality, leave to amend is not to be granted automatically. Jackson v. … Johnson v.

Martins v. New West Investment Group

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2023

Plaintiff insisted Brown pay him to use his 20 Plans, but Brown declined to pay the price Plaintiff wanted. (Id. at ¶ 108.) Construction 21 began in 2015. … Hardage v.

United States v. Coachella Valley County Water Dist.

111 F. Supp. 172 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 11, 1953

Corp. v. … And in Whiteside v.

Russell v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 9, 2023

Plaintiff cites Brown v. Dillards, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004, 1010- 8 12 (9th Cir. 2005) in support of her contention that Defendants failed to engage in 9 arbitration. … Hoover v.

Houck v. Jose

72 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 14, 1947

See Brown v. Gurney, 1906, 201 U.S. 184, 191 , 26 S.Ct. 509 , 50 L.Ed. 717 . … Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 1881, 104 U.S. 636 , 26 L.Ed. 875 ; Tucker v. Masser, 1885, 113 U.S. 203 , 5 S.Ct. 420 , 28 L.Ed. 979 ; Peabody Gold Mining Co. v.

Cruz v. United States

247 F. Supp. 3d 1138 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 2017

Ralston v. … In Peters v.

United States Aviation Underwriters Inc., a New York corporation, individually and on behalf of United States Aircraft Insurance Group v. Aerospike Iron, LLC, a California limited liability company; and Charles Brandes, a California resident

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 3, 2026

Transportation Safety 14 Board’s (“NTSB”) report. … “[T]he only reports that are admissible are the factual reports 19 that investigators do, not the Board’s findings, either factual or probable cause. . . .” Id. 20 (cleaned up); see also Benna v.

United States v. Gaitan

4 F.2d 848 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 1, 1925

S. v. Yatune (D. C.) 292 F. 497 . … Agnello v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 290 F. 671, 679 ; cases cited in Judge Gilbert’s opinion in Temperani v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 299 F. 365, 369 .

Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

95 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 22, 1951

Department of the Army, Office of Contract Settlement Appeal Board, Proceedings No. 47 and 225, June 10, 1948, 4 CCF Par. 60, 542; Aircraft Fueling Co. Inc. v. … Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742 , 68 S.Ct. 1294 , 92 L.Ed. 1694 (also cited as Pownall v. United States); De Laval Steam Turbine Co. v.

Dougherty

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 26, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495. “If additional 7 || proceedings can remedy defects in the original administrative proceedings, a social security 8 || case should be remanded.” Lewin v.

Ballard v. Laird

350 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 25, 1972

Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 and Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 539 , 91 S.Ct. 1586 , 29 L.Ed.2d 90 . … Frontiero v. Laird, 327 F.Supp. 580 (M.D.Ala., 1971); and Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 345 F.2d 236 (2d Cir., 1965).

Donaghe v. Sherman Heights Elementary

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 20, 2024

See Doe v. Brown University, 896 F.3d 26 127, 131–32 (1st Cir. 2018) (citing North Haven Bd. of Ed. v. … No. 1 at 2; Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436, 439 (9th Cir. 1995) (First 11 Amendment right to film matters of public interest); Brown v.

In re Alberti

41 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 29, 1941

. & Survol v. … In City of Stockton v.

Stultz

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 5, 2026

“The State of California has not waived its Eleventh 4 Amendment immunity with respect to claims brought under § 1983 in federal court.” 5 Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26; see also Brown v. Cal. … 19 (“Board”), and the Board acted on the claim, or the time for doing so expired.

Winter v. I.C. System Inc.

543 F. Supp. 2d 1210 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 2008

Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1550 (9th Cir.1989). … HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1167 (3d Cir.1987); see also Brown v. Budget Rent-A-Car Sys., 119 F.3d 922, 924 (11th Cir.1997); Mabe v. G.C. Servs. Ltd. Partnership, 32 F.3d 86 , 88 (4th Cir.1994).

Tomich v. Western Loan & Building Co.

4 F. Supp. 635 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 20, 1933

See discussion in Fry v. Charter Oak Life Ins. Co. (C. C.) 31 F. 197 , with citations. … Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs, 274 U. S. 208 , 47 S. Ct. 578 , 71 L. Ed. 1002 ; Central Trust Co. v. McGeorge, 151 U. S. 129 , 14 S. Ct. 286 , 38 L. Ed. 98 .

The Estate of Elisa Serna v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 5, 2024

Connick v. 21 Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. 22 v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997)). … Long, 442 26 F.3d at 1186 (quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 409); see also Brown, 520 U.S. at 409 27 (“The likelihood that the situation will recur and the predictability that an officer 28 lacking specific tools to handle

Manufacturers Life Ins. Co. v. Moore

116 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 4, 1953

Co. v. McDavid, D.C., 39 F.Supp. 228 ; Neff v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. … Co. v.

In re Hindin

219 F. 605 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 11, 1914

In Truett v. Onderdonk, 120 Cal. 581 , page 588, 53 Pac. 26 , page 29, Mr. Justice Van Fleet said, “The presumption is always against fraud — a presumption approximating in strength to that of innocence of crime.” … In Re Brown (D.

Oliva v. kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 12, 2023

Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Brown-Hunter v. 14 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015)). The “clear and convincing standard requires 15 an ALJ to show his work.” Smartt v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 10 494.