Case law

Wagman-Geller

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 2026

Stasz v. Schwab, 10 121 Cal. … Defendant emphasizes that (1) the Mayer Brown attorney on AAA’s Council, 3 did not draft a policy paper on behalf of the U.S.

California Electric Power Co. v. United States

89 F. Supp. 269 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 16, 1950

To settle the arrear-ages of dividends the Board of Directors had previously, by resolution, on May 29, 1941, authorized the making of an offer to the preferred shareholders of % share of $3 cumulative preferred stock and … The government urges two decisions of the Ninth Circuit as authority for its position in this case, Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Welch, 101 F.2d 454 , and Southern Pacific Co., v. Berliner, 176 F.2d 671 .

Wisconsin Foundation Research Foundation v. Vitamin Technologists, Inc.

41 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 1, 1941

Co. v. Brown, 8 Cir., 114 F. 939, 944 . … Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co., D.C., 10 F.2d 851 ; Brown Saddle Co. v. Troxel, C.C., 98 F. 620 ; Trico Products Corporation v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc., D.C., 49 F.2d 404 ; Harms v.

Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego

324 F. Supp. 371 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 17, 1971

Consolidated Flower Shipments Inc., Bay Area v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 205 F.2d 449 (9th Cir. 1953). … In the case of Acosta v.

Hodroff v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

District Court, S.D. California · May 12, 2025

Brown v. Transworld Sys., 26 Inc., 73 F.4th 1030, 1040, 1044 (9th Cir. 2023). So each alleged “occurrence of an FDCPA 27 violation” must, on its own, survive the statute-of-limitations analysis. … See Salameh v.

Cooper v. Garcia

55 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, S.D. California · May 27, 1999

Ivey v. Board of Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1982). … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Aguilar

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 2026

Canlis v. … Grant v.

Ex Parte T. Nagata

11 F.2d 178 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 1926

Lewis v. Frick, 34 S. Ct. 488 , 233 U. S. 291 , 58 L. Ed. 967 ; Zakonaite v. Wolf, 33 S. Ct. 31 , 226 U. S. 272, 57 . L. Ed. 218; Kwock Jan Fat v. White, 40 S. Ct. 566 , 253 U. S. 454 , 64 L. Ed. 1010 ; Bilokumsky v. … Ed. 221 ; Chryssikos v. Commissioner, 3 F.(2d) 372 (C. C. A. 2d); U. S. v. Curran, 4 F.(2d) 356 (C. C. A. 3d).

Lee v. Social Security Administration

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 2, 2025

Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. … Men’s Colony v.

Moyle v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan

263 F. Supp. 3d 999 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 11, 2017

(“Board”); Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Inc. … On October 17, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint against Defendants Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan (“Plan”); Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan Retirement Board (“Board”), the^ Plan administrator

Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.

104 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 29, 1952

Brown, 1943, 317 U.S. 341, 351 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 . 10 . See cases Cited in Notes 18 to 21,. Balian Ice Cream Co., Inc., v. Arden. Farms Co., supra. 11 . Standard Oil Company v. … See, Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters, 1946, 29 Cal.2d 34, 48 , 172 P.2d 867 . 31 . 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 .

Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission

472 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 6, 1979

Shortly after San Diego Gas and Electric Company’s board of directors resolved to terminate the Sundesert project, Mr. Thorn-berry lost his job due to a reduction in force. … Perez v.

Robert D. Johnson v. Ana Mondet, Scott Steadman, H. Mosely, Brian Wilfong, Ronald Bates, Jessica Lewis, James Hill, Patrick O’Neill

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 16, 2025

Ashcroft v. … See West 8 v.

Dunsmore v. State of California

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 13, 2023

Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981). … No. 420 at 8 (citing In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C.

Fletes-Mora v. Rogers

160 F. Supp. 215 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 1958

. § 1009 ], of the administrative proceedings in the Immigration and Naturalization Service of the Department of Justice, and a judgment annulling the final administrative order, as affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals … As the Board of Immigration.-. Appeals pointed out: “The record does-not establish that the [Post Office] employment * * * was open only to na *217 tionals of Mexico.

R. T. B. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 22, 2021

Brown Decl. at 4. Ms. … Findley Decl. at 3-4; see also Brown Decl. at n1. In a case arising out of very similar 2 circumstances, the court approved a settlement providing a net recovery of $4,800,000. I.A. ex 3 rel. Acuna v.

Skelly v. Dockweiler

75 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 1947

On November 6, 1947, Mission Corporation, a Nevada corporation, not a defendant herein, to be referred to as Mission, through its Board of Directors, issued a notice of a special meeting of stockholders to be held at the … language which so fully answers the contention here made that such control, of necessity, taints the acts of the controlling interests with fraud, that we quote it here in full : 4 “Where two corporations, through their boards

Estrada-Hernandez v. Holder

108 F. Supp. 3d 936 · District Court, S.D. California · May 27, 2015

River Street Donuts, LLC v. … Kaneko’s prominent national reputation, the Board found that Ms.

In re Pacific Automation Products, Inc.

224 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 6, 1964

On the same day William V. … Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742 , 68 S.Ct. 1294 , 92 L.Ed. 1694 (1947), rehearing denied, Pownall v. U. S., 335 U.S. 836 , 69 S.Ct. 11 , 93 L.Ed. 389 (1948).

Pemberton

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 13, 2026

See Vasquez v. … (citing Reddy v.