Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.02s
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2024
May 8, 2023); 8 Browne v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., No. CV 23-01551 DSF (JPRx), 2023 U.S. Dist. 9 LEXIS 73143, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2023); Doe v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., No. … Mohr v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownContreras v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. California · Apr 3, 2020
Brown-Hunter v. … Brown- 8 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493–94 (9th Cir. 2015).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 12, 2024
Spokeo, Inc. v. … (ECF 199, 3 at 49); see Brown v. TGS Mgmt. Co., 57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 303, 316–17 (Ct.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAriix, LLC v. Nutrisearch Corporation
District Court, S.D. California · Apr 13, 2023
Id. at 1115–16 (quoting Hunt v. City of Los Angeles, 638 23 F.3d 703, 715 (9th Cir. 2011)); see also Bolger v. Youngs Drug Prods. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKhoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.
189 F. Supp. 3d 998 · District Court, S.D. California · May 19, 2016
The Light Study’s Data Monitoring Committee “found that it [was] particularly concerning that members of Orexigen’s Board of Directors ..., who have financial interest in the outcome of the trial, were also provided full … See, e.g., Taylor v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 9, 2021
Zukle v. … Duvall 3 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2024
May 8, 2023); 8 Browne v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., No. CV 23-01551 DSF (JPRx), 2023 U.S. Dist. 9 LEXIS 73143, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2023); Doe v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., No. … Mohr v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 6, 2023
Nichols 14 v. Saul, 2019 WL 6252934, at *10 (S.D. Cal., Nov. 22, 2019) (quoting Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 15 at 495). … See Leon v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2024
May 8, 2023); 8 Browne v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., No. CV 23-01551 DSF (JPRx), 2023 U.S. Dist. 9 LEXIS 73143, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2023); Doe v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., No. … Mohr v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 12, 2023
See Silva v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 931 n.7 (9th Cir. 2005); 15 see also Munoz v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs., No. CV 18-10264-CJC (KS), 2020 WL 5199517, 16 at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 24, 2020); Greene v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 18, 2022
Osenbrock v. Apfel, 13 240 F.3d 1157, 1162 (9th Cir. 2001). … Lorber, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon. 21 [Doc. No. 7-2, at pp. 27-28, 32.] At the start of the hearing, the ALJ indicated to 22 Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAl-Sadeai v. U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement
District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 2021
In Singh v. … Diouf v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Feb 10, 2020
Los Angeles County Board of 4 || Supervisors v. Superior Court, 2 Cal.5th 282, 293 (Cal. 2016). “Invoices for legal 5 services are generally not communicated for the purpose of legal consultation. … Venture Group v. Superior Court, 118 Cal.App.4th 96, 102 (Cal. App. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2022
Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 6 (9th Cir. 2010). … Merck v. Swift 12 Transp. Co., No. CV-16-01103-PHX-ROS, 2018 WL 4492362, at *2 (D. Ariz.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 5, 2020
Specifically, in the verdict, the jury found that “Anthony Johnson breach[ed] his duty 8 of loyalty by knowingly acting against Storix, Inc.’s interests while serving on the Board 9 of Directors of Storix, Inc.” … United 14 States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
544 F. Supp. 2d 1080 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 12, 2008
In Mahurkar v. C.R. … In Bose Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFernandez v. Progressive Management Systems
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2022
Cal. 2012) (UCL standing does not require a tangible monetary expenditure); 6 Brown v. … Rubio v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSumana Forest Retreat v. County of San Diego, California
District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 2025
Major Use Permit applications require approval by the County Board 3 of Supervisors or Planning Commission. SAC ¶ 60; ECF No. 22-8 at 2. … City of Auburn v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 2, 2020
Board of Regents of the University of Alaska, 4 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Lira v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna