Case law

Lopez v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 21, 2025

(citing Brown v. City of 17 Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 270-73 (3d Cir. 2009); Hoye v. City of Oakland, 653 F.3d 835, 18 843 (9th Cir. 2011); Vitagliano v. … Travel v.

Pacific Resources Associates LLC v. Suzy Cleaners

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 2025

Long asserts that California Regional Water Quality Board has never 15 identified Ms. … City of Emeryville v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1251, 1266 (9th Cir. 2010) 8 (emphasis added); Gackstetter v. Frawley, 135 Cal.

United States v. Goldsmith

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 21, 2021

App’x at 551; see also Lippi v. … v.

Ralph v. Hosseini

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 2021

Biller v. … The arbitrator then proceeded to discuss an unpublished California 7 Court of Appeal case, DeRosa v. California Unemployed Insurance Appeals Board, No. 8 F0444247, 2005 WL 3877622, (Feb. 17, 2005).

Ragodo v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 30, 2019

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting 10 Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th Cir. 1998)). … Ghanim v.

Gilles v. Wineteer

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 14, 2019

Cholerton v. Brown, No. CV-13-8992-GW, 2014 WL 3828209, at *1 (C.D. Cal. 7 Aug. 1, 2014); see also McCain v. California Highway Patrol, No. 11-CV-01265-KJM, 8 2017 WL 4269877, at *3–*4 (E.D. Cal. … Gilbrook v.

Masimo Corporation v. Sotera Wireless

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 1, 2021

Sotera seeks a stay in light of 18 its filings of nine petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) with the Patent and Trial Appeal 19 Board (“PTAB”) for each of the nine patents asserted by Masimo in this litigation. … See Dees v.

Bray v. Espinoza

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 31, 2020

Wilson v. Sellers, 138 S. Ct. 27 1188, 1192 (2018); see also Ylst v. … See Turner v.

Ramsey v. Zhang-MD

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 23, 2020

Board of Regents of the University 3 of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 4 “Courts must consider the complaint in its entirety,” including “documents 5 incorporated into the … Snow v.

Williams-McGloster v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 4, 2019

See, e.g., Garcia v. 25 Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 768 F.3d 925, 930 (9th Cir. 2014); Tonapetyan v. Halter, 242 F.3d 26 1144, 1150 (9th Cir.2001); Smolen, 80 F.3d at 1288; Brown v. … See Terry v.

Montalvo v. Spencer

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 31, 2020

v. … Morris v. 13 Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 11–12 (1983) (quoting Ungar v.

Spy Optic Inc. v. AreaTrend, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 13, 2020

Ballard v. … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 127 (2014) (quoting Goodyear 13 Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).

Hau v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 2020

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin,806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). First, the court “leave[s] 28 it to the ALJ to determine credibility, resolve conflicts in testimony, and resolve 1 ambiguities in the record.” … Burch v.

Shears v. United States of America

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 2019

In Klein v. … Monaco v.

Shaughnessy v. LVNV Funding, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 2, 2021

Stone Brewing Co., LLC v. Millercoors 14 || LLC, 2021 WL 63139, at *6 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2021) (citing Kilroy v. L.A. Unified School 15 || Dist. Board of Education, 2017 WL 10544624, at *1 (C.D. Cal. … Oct. 5, 2017) (quoting 16 || Russell v.

Burton v. McVay

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 2024

See Taylor v. … See Jones v.

Chloe Z Fishing Co. v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd.

109 F. Supp. 2d 1236 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 26, 2000

Inc. v. … Harris v.

Thomas v. Aguilar

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 2024

Nigro v. … Id. at 1171 (quoting Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 937 (9th Cir. 2005)).

Khachikian

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 8, 2026

Hamdi v. … Rombot v. Souza, 296 F. Supp. 3d 383, 388 (D. Mass. 2017) 9 (quoting Waldron v.

Eoll

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 10, 2026

“If a court determines that some hours billed are not 6 reasonable, it may exclude them using one of two methods: the court may either conduct 7 an ‘hour-by-hour analysis’ of the fee request or make an ‘across the board … Moreno v.