Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.43s

  • Constantinovici v. Bondi

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 10, 2025

    Petitioner appealed the denial, which the 23 Board of Immigration Appeals denied on February 14, 2011. … See Mathews v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mills v. Patricio; Valencia; California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 26, 2026

    Serrano v. … See Wood v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Edwards

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 2026

    (People v. … See Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 3 118, 127 (2022) (“[S]atisfying Brecht is only a necessary, not a sufficient, condition to 4 relief. [28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)] too must be satisfied.”), citing Brecht v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Montez v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 24, 2024

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 7 492 (9th Cir. 2015). “[T]he burden of showing that an error is harmful normally falls upon 8 the party attacking the agency’s determination.” Molina v. … Stiffler v. 6 O’Malley, 102 F.4th 1102, 1107 (9th Cir. 2024); see also Jeanette R. v. Kijakazi, 620 F. 7 Supp. 3d 1127, 1143 (E.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kakowski v. Allison

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 14, 2022

    Nordstrom v. … Clayton ignored signs of liver failure reported by 12 Plaintiff, including dark brown urine, stomach pain and back aches, but “time and time 13 again I was ignored.” (Id. at 10.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • L.W. v. Snap Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 5, 2023

    The “prototypical service qualifying for [CDA] 2 immunity is an online messaging board (or bulletin board) on which Internet 3 subscribers post comments and respond to comments posted by others.” … Ebner v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Services Employees International Union

    147 F. Supp. 3d 1094 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 23, 2015

    “Substance rather than legalistic form” is all the Board has ever required in multi-employer bargaining. Frito-Lay, 623 F.2d at 1358 . … Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Abera v. San Diego Pacificvu LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 25, 2025

    Noel v. … Nov. 25, 17 2020) (denying prisoner’s IFP motion and denying the TRO motion as moot); Olajide v. 18 Brown, Case No. 18-cv-03991-CRB, 2018 WL 3328227, at *3 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • James E. Turner v. Neil McDowell

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 8, 2021

    Hayes v. Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 978 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). However, 18 the reasoning on any related claim by the state court is relevant. See Frantz v. … Majoy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Matheis v. CDCR

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 5, 2021

    Ashcroft v. … Brown, No. 2:15-CV-2544-JAM-AC P, 2018 WL 1875631, at *4 (E.D. Cal. 3 Apr. 19, 2018), report and recommendation adopted, No. 2:15-CV-2544-JAM-AC P, 2018 4 WL 2441713 (E.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dorado v. Crumb

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 11, 2021

    Heck v. … Ramirez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pratt

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2026

    Courts have therefore found that 27 standing is met at the motion to dismiss stage when the alleged misrepresentation is the 28 same, Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., 913 F. Supp. 2d 881, 890–91 (N.D. … Whiteside v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rehman v. Moreno

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 3, 2020

    See Kingsley 19 v. … DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. Dep’t 2 of Soc. Servs., 489 U.S. 189, 199-200 (1989); see Henry A. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corona v. It's a New 10, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 2025

    Jones v. … Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., 912 F. 11 Supp. 2d 861, 869 (N.D. Cal. 2012); see also Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., 913 F. 12 Supp. 2d 881, 890 (N.D. Cal. 2012); Werdebaugh v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ewing v. BF Advance, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 2, 2021

    Goodyear 12 Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). “A corporation is 13 typically subject to general jurisdiction in its place of incorporation or principal place of 14 business. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • San Diego County Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2021

    Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) 9 which is also unchanged. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arellano v. Guldseth

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 30, 2020

    v. … Aug. 8, 2019) (“As an agency 22 of the State, the CDCR is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity, and so is CCHCS.” 23 (internal citation omitted) (citing Brown v. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 1, 2021

    See Carrigan v. Cal. … Hayes v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ledezma

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 2, 2025

    O’Lone v. … Brown, 16 F.3d 4 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994)); Fuqua, 120 F.4th at 1352 (“An inmate asserting a Free Exercise 5 claim must first show that he or she has a sincerely held religious belief that was impinged 6 by government

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • SEMX Corp. v. Federal Insurance

    398 F. Supp. 2d 1103 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 31, 2005

    (One), p. 5 (quoting Rinaldi v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 199 Cal.App.3d 217, 223 , 244 Cal.Rptr. 637 (1988)). … V.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.