Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.36s

  • Yousif v. McLaren Automotive, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 21, 2024

    Anderson v. … See FDA v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Crossfit, Inc. v. Matrix Solutions, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 28, 2020

    Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. 15 Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 923 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 16 (1945) (internal quotations omitted)). … See Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • RAJMP, INC. v. United States

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 25, 2020

    See Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1247 (9th 28 1 all terms and conditions of the OIC contract. (See generally Doc. No. 1.) … Ctr. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Ortega

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 2021

    Jones v. Bock, 549 3 U.S. 199, 216 (2007). … See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 736 (2001). “To be available, 16 a remedy must be available ‘as a practical matter’; it must be ‘capable of use; 17 at hand.’” Albino, 747 F.3d at 1171 (citing Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Skyline Wesleyan Church v. California Department of Managed Health Care

    322 F.R.D. 571 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 22, 2017

    Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 613-14 (N.D. Cal. 1995); see also Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana, 936 F.2d 1027, 1033-34 (9th Cir. 1990); Kelly v. City of San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 653, 660 (N.D. Cal. 1987); Miller v. … Brown ("Governor’s Office”) on legal matters that arise out of or relate to the DMHC. (Ravel Decl. at ¶¶ 2-3.) .Mr.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lippucci v. Berryhill

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 2020

    See, e.g., 9 Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492-93 (9th Cir. 2015); Burrell v. Colvin, 775 F.3d 10 1133, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2014); Vasquez v. … ; Warre v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rickes v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 15, 2025

    Corp. v. … Craig v. Brown & Root, 6 Inc., 84 Cal. App. 4th 416, 420 (2000). Ordinarily, however, “silence or inaction does 7 not constitute acceptance of an offer.” Norcia, 845 F.3d at 1284 (quoting Golden Eagle 8 Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n (In Re Thrifty Oil Co.)

    249 B.R. 537 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 13, 2000

    Partnership, 247 B.R. 722, 730 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2000); Brown v. Sayyah (In re ICH Corp.), 230 B.R. 88, 93-94 (N.D.Tex.1999). … Corp. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Clarke v. Saul

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 6, 2020

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). 5 First, the Court “leave[s] it to the ALJ to determine credibility, resolve conflicts in 6 the testimony, and resolve ambiguities in the record.” … See Clark v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Quijada v. Wolf

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    See 1 Brown Jordan Int’l, Inc. v. Mind’s Eye Interiors, Inc., 236 F. Supp. 2d 1152, 1154 (D. 2 Haw. 2002); Lockheed Missile & Space Co., Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 887 F. Supp. 3 1320, 1323 (N.D. Cal. 1995). … Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lopez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2025

    counsel, client representatives with full 15 authority to make final decisions regarding any settlement offer, and any insurance 16 representatives; (ii) Identification of any persons or entities, such as a board … Times Mirror Co. v. U.S., 873. F.2d 1210, 1211 n.1 (9th Cir. 1989); Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lynch v. Burnett

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 29, 2019

    Jones v. … Ericson v. City of Phoenix, No. CV-14-01942-PHX-JAT, 2016 WL 6522805, at *13 (D. 26 Ariz. Nov. 3, 2016); see also Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garland v. Duane Morris, LLP

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 4, 2024

    Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988) (quoting 11 Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 622 (1964)). … Decker Coal Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ferrer

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 1, 2026

    Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 25 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. … A statement of facts not reasonably in dispute. 28 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dousa v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 28, 2020

    [v. … Int'l v. Stearns, 362 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Renovate America, Inc. v. Lloyd's Syndicate 1458

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 10, 2019

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Co. v. Hawaiian Elec. Indus., 1995 WL 1913089, at *12 (D. Haw. 24 Dec. 15, 1995) (same); see also Brown v. Am. Int’l Grp., Inc., 339 F. Supp. 2d 336, 345 25 (D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mourning v. McDowell

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 6, 2020

    Id.; see also Preiser v. … See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 5 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Certain Parcels of Land Situate

    85 F. Supp. 986 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 1949

    Co. v. … VI, 2nd Ed. p. 270; and, for an interesting case dealing with what constitutes an innocent purchaser for value without notice, see Williamson v. Brown, Court of Appeals of New York, 1857, 15 N.Y. 354 12 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Klat

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 20, 2025

    Fort v. … Jensen v. Brown, 131 F.4th 677, 696 (9th Cir. 2025); Alden v. 25 Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 712 (1999) (“We have . . . sometimes referred to the States’ immunity 26 from suit as ‘Eleventh Amendment immunity.’

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ward v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 28, 2025

    Keates v. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 22 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it 23 employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.