Case law

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 2021

Garcia v. … Co. v.

Christopher Allen of the Family Ottersbach v. Kilgore

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 28, 2025

Brockmeyer v. … Modglin v. DJO Glob. Inc., 1 |jaddress and contact information for all state agencies departments, boards, and 2 ||commissions.

Barbarin v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 23, 2020

Board of Regents of the University 18 of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 19 B. … Walker v. Gomez, 370 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 15 2004) (citing Turner v.

Fleischman v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 19, 2023

In deciding to reject a claimant’s testimony about the severity of 24 symptoms, the ALJ must provide “specific, clear, and convincing reasons for doing so.” 25 Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 3 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted). Ultimately, the “clear and convincing” standard requires 4 an ALJ to show his work. Id.

Soe v. Progenity, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 1, 2021

STANDARDS BOARD 2019).] … Louis v.

Ramirez v. Miranda

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 12, 2021

McLean v. … Brown, 2018 16 WL 1875631 (E.D. Cal.

Casey

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 24, 2026

Petitioner filed appealed the IJ’s decision with the Board of 1 Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and filed a motion to reopen his immigration proceedings. 2 (See id.) … Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 689 (2001).

Rutherford v. Evans Hotels, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · May 14, 2021

Brown 8 v. Lucky Stores, 246, F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2001). The purpose of awarding fees to a 9 prevailing defendant is “‘to deter the bringing of lawsuits without foundation.’” CRST Van 10 Expedited, Inc. v. … Brown, 246 12 F.3d at 1190.

40235 Washington St. Corp. v. WC LUSARDI

177 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 10, 2001

See Ellis v. … Before judicially challenging an assessment, the taxpayer must first exhaust all administrative remedies by appealing to the county equalization board. See id.; see also, Sea World Inc. v.

Williams v. Ortega

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 2021

Jones v. Bock, 549 3 U.S. 199, 216 (2007). … See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 736 (2001). “To be available, 16 a remedy must be available ‘as a practical matter’; it must be ‘capable of use; 17 at hand.’” Albino, 747 F.3d at 1171 (citing Brown v.

Neighborhood Market Association, Inc. v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 2021

Garcia v. … Co. v.

Reyes v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2022

Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) 27 (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488–89 (9th Cir. 2015)). … See Fair v.

Allen v. Booth

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 24, 2020

Hudson v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 441 (1997)); Ramirez v. Bartos, No. 7 CV 05-2291-PHX-MHM (HCE), 2007 WL 2725246, at *5 (D. Ariz.

United States v. Standard Oil Co.

78 F. Supp. 850 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 28, 1948

Brown, 1943, 317 U.S. 341, 351 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ; United States v. Heating, Piping & Air Conditioning Contractors, 1940, D.C.Cal., 33 F.Supp. 978, 979 ; United States v. … Ct. at page 945 . 31 National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, 1939, 306 U.S. 601, 606 , 59 S.Ct. 668, 671 , 83 L.Ed. 1014 ; and see, Signode Steel Strapping Co. v.

United States v. Certain Parcels of Land Situate

85 F. Supp. 986 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 1949

Co. v. … VI, 2nd Ed. p. 270; and, for an interesting case dealing with what constitutes an innocent purchaser for value without notice, see Williamson v. Brown, Court of Appeals of New York, 1857, 15 N.Y. 354 12 .

Joelson v. United States

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 3, 2020

Browning; Jay B. Bybee; Consuelo M. Callahan; William C. Canby, Jr.; Richard R. Clifton; 26 Joseph Jerome Farris; Raymond C. Fisher; William A. Fletcher; Michelle T. Friedland; Alfred T. Goodwin; Ronald M. … See Rosati v.

Robinson v. Zembrano

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 16, 2020

Brown v. … See Schwenk v.

Shammam v. American Honda Finance Corporation

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 28, 2024

Johnson v. … App. 4th 1194, 1208 (2008) (quoting Gem 8 Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc., 213 Cal. App. 3d 419, 431 (1989)); see 9 also Stop Loss Ins. Brokers, Inc. v. Brown & Toland Med. Grp., 143 Cal.

Citizens Development Corporation, Inc. v. San Diego, County of

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 11, 2021

On approximately September 20, 2011, the California Regional 23 Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (“the RWQCB”) issued an Investigative 24 Order (“the IO”) alleging that Plaintiff CDC had released pollutants … The Ball Report is not a Court record. 6 However, the Court will take judicial notice of the San Diego Regional Water 7 Quality Control Board Approval of the RI/FS, for the fact that the report was approved. 8

Quijada v. Wolf

District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

See 1 Brown Jordan Int’l, Inc. v. Mind’s Eye Interiors, Inc., 236 F. Supp. 2d 1152, 1154 (D. 2 Haw. 2002); Lockheed Missile & Space Co., Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 887 F. Supp. 3 1320, 1323 (N.D. Cal. 1995). … Jones v.