Case law

Ganoe v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 26, 2019

Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 27 2008) (citation omitted); see Brown-Hunter v. … Rollins v.

Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 30, 2019

KATZ, and THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SORRENTO 20 THERAPEUTICS, INC., 21 … Cal.2009) 12 (quoting Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v.

Pathway Innovations and Technologies, Inc. v. IPEVO, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 24, 2020

Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON 8 Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545, 554 (2014); see also Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health 9 Mgmt. … SFA 14 Sys., LLC v. Newegg Inc., 793 F.3d 1344, 1348 (Fed.

Ortiz v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 19, 2022

(quoting Brown- 12 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d a478, 494 (9th Cir. 2015) (emphasis in original). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489.

Fay

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 6, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. 23 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). Rather, the reviewing court is “constrained to 24 review the reasons the ALJ asserts.” Id. (quoting Connett v. … See Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983). 17 The ALJ has a duty to develop the record fully and fairly and to assure that the 18 claimant’s interests are considered. Garcia v. Comm’r of Soc.

Stewart v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 17, 2020

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 23 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3d Cir. 1982); see also Boire v. … Salazar v.

Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 17, 2024

See Ahearn v. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 12 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). “[T]he burden of showing that an error is harmful normally 13 falls upon the party attacking the agency's determination.” Molina v.

Houston Municipal Employees Pension System v. BofI Holding, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 30, 2021

See BofI Federal Bank v. 16 Erhart, S.D. Cal. … Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 3 2006) (citing Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)).

Watkins v. Revak

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 23, 2019

Heck v. … Brown v. California Dep’t of Corrections, 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009); 14 see also Will v. Mich.

Mehboob Shah v. Desert Auto Group V LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 30, 2024

Welcome Ctr. v. 19 Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 150–51 (1984) (explaining that the Title VII statute of limitations 20 can be tolled in exceptional circumstances such as when a plaintiff is misled about a 21 deadline). … See Chaset v.

Lopez v. Hay

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 26, 2021

The staff gave Hay an 11 ultimatum: either report to the Betty Ford Foundation Drug Addiction Treatment Center, 12 or be fired and reported to the Medical Board of California. … Leite v.

Chan v. Mayorkas

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 18, 2024

Id. at 836 (quoting Zadvydas v. 17 Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 689 (2001)). … Kim v. Ashcroft, 7 No. 02CV1524-J (LAB), 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30818, at *11–12 (S.D. Cal. June 2, 2003) 8 (citing Khan v. Fasano, 194 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1136 (S.D. Cal. 2001); Fahim v. Ashcroft, 9 227 F.

J.K.J. v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 2020

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 6 U.S. 397, 415 (1997). “[A] municipality sued under § 1983 is not subject to vicarious 7 liability for the acts of its agents.” Duvall v. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404.

Hamilton v. Moseley

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 6, 2023

Terrell, 935 F.2d at 1017 (quoting Wilborn 14 v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)); see also Harrington v. Scribner, 785 15 F.3d 1299, 1309 (9th Cir. 2015). … See Brown v. Reif, 2019 WL 989874, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2 1, 2019) (denying appointment of counsel where the plaintiff’s filing demonstrated ability 3 to properly litigate case despite mental illness); Ordaz v.

Myhre v. Seventh-Day Adventist Church Reform Movement American Union International Missionary Society

298 F.R.D. 633 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 17, 2014

Miller v. Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 292, 299 (C.D.Cal.1992). A district court has discretion to permit or deny jurisdictional discovery. Boschetto v. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011).

Vargas v. Reno

966 F. Supp. 1537 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 1997

The INS appealed this decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on September 14, 1995. … See Yick Wo v.

Sekerke v. Hoodenpyle

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 16, 2019

Jones v. … Soto v. Sweetman, 882 F.3d 865, 872 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 942-43 (9th Cir. 2005)).

Venson v. Jackson

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 2020

See Torbert v. Gore, 2016 WL 3460262, at 10 *2 (S.D. Cal. June 23, 2016) (citation omitted); see also Armstrong v. … Stakey v. Stander, 2011 WL 887563, at *3 n.1 (D. Idaho Mar. 10, 2011); 19 see also Dixon v.

Medicinova, Inc. v. Genzyme Corporation

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 20, 2021

Poster boards 25 would have sufficed.”). … Here, Defendant did not use poster boards at all, but PowerPoint presentations 17 alone, whereas in Affymetrix the plaintiff used both poster boards and a PowerPoint 18 presentation. See id.

Esparza v. Kohls, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 18, 2024

Corp. v. … “The Ninth Circuit’s decision stands for the 19 proposition that plaintiffs can state an economic injury for their misappropriated data.” 20 Brown v. Google LLC, No.: 4:20-cv-3664-YGR, 2023 WL 5029899, at *19 (N.D.