Case law

Peruta v. County of San Diego

758 F. Supp. 2d 1106 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 10, 2010

People v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Plaintiffs’ due process claim is governed by Erdelyi v.

National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.

959 F. Supp. 2d 1264 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 2, 2013

Co. v. … During the covered period, the Diocese, as a self insurer, was required to pay assessments into New York’s Workers’ Compensation Board. The Diocese sought to recover these assessments from Lloyd’s.

Hardyman v. Collins

80 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 4, 1948

In Shelley v. … Nebraska, 1923, 262 U.S. 390 , 43 S.Ct. 625 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 , 29 A.L.R. 1446 ; West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 1943, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 , 147 A.L.R. 674 ; Screws v.

Uriarte-Limon v. 2 TM Tobacco Inc

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 2, 2024

See Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1247 (9th Cir. 2013). 28 1 . . .” … Lentini v. Cal.

Baier v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 2025

See Brown v. Elec. … Khoja 6 v.

Anderson v. Del Toro

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 12, 2024

Hearns v. … v.

Kakowski v. Allison

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 13, 2022

Plaintiff claims Clayton repeatedly 5 ignored the signs of liver failure Plaintiff reported, including dark brown urine, stomach 6 pain, and back aches. … Plaintiff alleges that inmates are allowed to obtain this information, 16 with certain redactions, before their Board hearings, and Defendants can “delete and 17 redact” confidential names and sources.

Bouman v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 5, 2024

Gompper v. … Moss v. U.S.

LaRose

District Court, S.D. California · May 19, 2026

Petitioner filed an appeal of the IJ’s removal order with the Board of 9 Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on January 8, 2026, which remains pending. (Id. at 4–5.) 10 B. … See Zichko v.

Dunsmore v. State of California

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 16, 2024

See e.g., Haines v. Liggetts Grp., Inc., 975 F.2d 81, 91 (3d Cir. 1992); Med. Imaging 12 Ctrs. of Am., Inc. v. Lichtenstein, 917 F. Supp. 717, 719 (S.D. Cal. 1996). … Estakhrian v. Obenstine, No. CV 17 11-03480 GAC(CWx), 2012 WL 12884889, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012) (quoting 18 Kounelis v. Sherrer, 529 F. Supp. 2d 503, 518 (D. N.J. 2008)); see also Hoar v.

Thomas v. Chu

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2020

Coleman v. Brown, 28 F. Supp. 3d 1068, 1075 (E.D. Cal. … , or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board.”). 24 25 11 Plaintiff does not explain the difference between inmates designated

Nelson v. Allison

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 2, 2023

Oalsen v. … This interpretation ignores the statute’s plain meaning.”); cf. 8 Brown v. Tromba, No. 2:17-cv-2396-APC-BNW, 2020 WL 5632950, at *2 n.1 (D.

Vasquez v. Paramo

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 18, 2019

Jones 24 v. … Brown v. 28 Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 936 (9th Cir. 2005). 1 In its prior order, the Court granted summary judgment as to Defendants D. 2 Paramo, Aguirre, A. Gonzalez, R.

Nieber v. Robertson

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 12, 2024

Cassett v. … Lewis v.

Kennedy v. Hatfield

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 6, 2020

Ard v. F.D.I.C., 770 F. 16 Supp. 2d 1029, 1041 (C.D. Cal. 2011). “Dismissal without leave to amend is proper if it 17 is clear that the complaint could not be saved by amendment.” Kendall v. … Conant 20 v. Brown, 248 F. Supp. 3d 1014, 1018 (D. Or. 2017). 21 Here, plaintiff has not requested leave to amend.

Brinker v. Axos Bank

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 31, 2023

Starr v. … See 15 Wadler v.

United States v. Guess

390 F. Supp. 2d 979 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 1, 2005

Sliwa v. … The government relies on United States v.

Serpa v. Jolly King Restaurants, Inc.

62 F.R.D. 626 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 8, 1974

Stilwell v. … Fowler v. Brown, 125 Cal.App.2d 450 , 270 P.2d 559 (Cal.App.1954).

Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation District

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 13, 2023

1 Dockstader are members of the District’s Board of Directors (together with the District, 2 “Defendants”). … Daniels-Hall v.

Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 12, 2019

Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 620 (N.D. Cal. 1995). 21 DISCUSSION 22 1. … Plaintiff 15 wants Defendants to produce internal company documents including 16 “internal financial summaries, financial presentations such as board 17 presentations, financial strategy documents, etc