Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
0.68s
District Court, S.D. California · Jun 24, 2020
Corp. v. Ariz. … Hironymous v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2026
Puga v. 21 Chertoff, 488 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Noriega-Lopez v. … Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976, 988 6 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Laing v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 20, 2026
.; Mathews v. … In Saengphet v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPolitte v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. California · Dec 2, 2022
Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000); see 22 also Andrews v. King, 393 F.3d 1113, 1121 (9th Cir. 2005); Barren v. … Hoagland, 13 2012 WL 2521753, at *3 (citing Brown v. Astrue, No. 11-cv-056-JL, 2011 WL 3664429, 14 at *3 (D.N.H.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 2, 2022
Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000); see 23 also Andrews v. King, 393 F.3d 1113, 1121 (9th Cir. 2005); Barren v. … Hoagland, 13 2012 WL 2521753, at *3 (citing Brown v. Astrue, No. 11-cv-056-JL, 2011 WL 3664429, 14 at *3 (D.N.H.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 8, 2026
Nadarajah v. Gonzales, 25 443 F.3d 1069, 1076 (9th Cir. 2006), abrogated on other grounds by Jennings v. Rodriguez, 26 583 U.S. 281 (2018); Alvarez v. Sessions, 338 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1048–49 (N.D. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNaghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. California · Feb 9, 2021
During the relevant time period, Defendant Tong was a member of Belter’s 14 board of directors and a member of Eastone’s board of directors, and Defendant Zhong was 15 also a member of Belter’s board of directors and … a member of Eastone’s board of directors. 16 (Doc.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBolgner-Linna v. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
District Court, S.D. California · Nov 7, 2024
Lewis v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., 627 F.3d 395, 400 (9th Cir. 2010). Rather, it 10 is the “amount at stake in the underlying litigation.” Theis Rsch., Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 11 400 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005). … (citing 10 Troensegaard v. Silvercrest Indus., Inc., 175 Cal.App.3d 218, 226–228 (1985) and 11 Marshall v. Brown, 141 Cal. App. 3d 408, 419 (1983)); see, e.g., McCrum v. Gen.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.
166 F. Supp. 3d 1103 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 11, 2015
Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 572 F.3d 1271, 1281 (11th Cir.2009) (citing Occidental of Umm al Qaywayn, Inc. v. A Certain Cargo of Petroleum, 577 F.2d 1196 (5th Cir.1978)). 2. … For example, in Stapper v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMartinez v. University of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California · Nov 7, 2024
Arredondo v. Univ. of La Verne, 341 F.R.D. 1 47, 51 (C.D. Cal. 2022) (quoting Ellis v. … Just Film, Inc., 847 14 F.3d at 1120 (quoting Comcast Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 22, 2026
See Nadarajah v. … .]”); see also Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPrime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Harris
216 F. Supp. 3d 1096 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 31, 2016
Town of Jay, 928 F.2d 480, 483-84 (1st Cir. 1991) (declining “to construe Golden State so broadly as to require inquiry.. .into the motives of the selectmen prior to the Board’s drafting and proposing the Ordinance”); c.f … Grp., *1116 Inc. v. San Bernardino Cty., 825 F.2d 1404, 1408 (9th Cir. 1987). "[T]he Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to shift the whole of the public law of the states into the federal courts.” Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 14, 2021
Molina v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489, 495. 27 2.
Cited 0 timesUnknownParkside/El Centro Homeowners Association v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
District Court, S.D. California · Jan 11, 2022
The "'good cause" standard under 15 Rule 16(b) "primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment." 16 Johnson v. … See, e.g., 9 Caldwell v. Bloomin’ Brands, Inc., Case No. ED CV 19-754-DMG (MRWx), 2021 WL 10 3264145, at *1 (C.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 5, 2026
Chambers v. 26 NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991). Accordingly, preservation orders are not issued as a 27 matter of course. See Impact Engine, Inc. v. … See 2 || Wright v. Beck, 981 F.3d 719, 729 (9th Cir. 2020).
Cited 0 timesUnknownThibodeau v. ADT Security Services
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 4, 2022
Barnard v. … Air Separation, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of 26 London, 45 F.3d 288, 290 (9th Cir. 1995) (quoting Perkins v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 7, 2021
Cal. 1 Men’s Colony v. … Calhoun v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 2020
at 13 |}935 (citing Skinner v. … The 24 || parole board could deny Petitioner parole “on the basis of any grounds presently available 25 it.” See id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 13, 2026
Nadarajah v. Gonzales, 21 443 F.3d 1069, 1076 (9th Cir. 2006), abrogated on other grounds by Jennings v. Rodriguez, 22 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018); Alvarez v. Sessions, 338 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1048–49 (N.D. … Walters v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna