Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.68s
Supermold Corp. of America v. American Tire Machinery Co.
27 F. Supp. 385 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 5, 1939
Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co., 6 Cir., 172 F. 371 , at page 392. … The claims in issue were allowed by the Board of Appeals in the Patent Office on the theory that the prior art patents, Hughes and Gewert, did not disclose a process in which one step consisted of allowing the tire to spread
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 2021
Griggs 3 v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982) (citing United States v. Hitchmon, 4 587 F.2d 1357 (5th Cir. 1979)). … Council, Inc. v. Sw. Marine Inc., 242 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th 7 Cir. 2001) (citing Masalosalo v. Stonewall Ins. Co., 718 F.2d 955, 956 (9th Cir. 1983); 20 8 James Wm.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHaney, Inc. v. Axium Bioresearch
District Court, S.D. California · Sep 25, 2025
Supp. 3d at 13 961 (quoting Brown v. Allstate Ins. Co., 17 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1140 (S.D. … Brown, 17 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 2026
. § 1915A(a), (b)(1)-(2); Resnick v. Hayes, 9 213 F.3d 443, 446–47 (9th Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 10 2011). … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th Cir. 2007) 20 (quoting Bennett v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 4, 2025
In that case, the Board of Immigration 25 Appeals revoked “jurisdiction” for “immigration judge[s]” to “consider the release on bond 26 of any noncitizen who entered without inspection.” Esquivel-Ipina v. … .”); Vazquez v. Feeley, 9 || No. 2:25-cv-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025) (same); 10 also Rodriguez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 2019
See 16 Castro-Cortez v. … Rojas- 20 Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 819 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation and quotation omitted); 21 Dhangu v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 3, 2025
See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … Brown v. Kennard, 94 Cal. App. 4th 15 40, 44 (Ct. App. 2001).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSouthern California Rental Housing Association v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 26, 2021
Sveen v. … Nos.2 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026
He appealed the denial of his asylum application to the Board 9 of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s decision in 10 February 2026. (Am. Pet. at 4.) … See Gomez Cabrera v. Blanche, United States Court 12 of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 26-948.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 23, 2026
See Gonzalez v. … See Olajide v. Brown, Case No. 18-cv-03991-CRB, 19 2018 WL 3328227, at *3 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFriends of Del Mar Bluffs v. North County Transit District
District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 2022
Gaus v. … Libhart 23 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown308 F. Supp. 2d 1168 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2004
Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 749 F.2d 530, 534 (9th Cir.1984); Neitzke v. … Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 705-06 (9th Cir.1998); Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner and Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542 , 1555 n. 19 (9th Cir.1989); MGIC Indem. Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Feb 17, 2026
But he has “appealed the removal order,” or at least is attempting to do so 4 through a “motion to reopen” with “the Board of Immigration Appeals.” (ECF 1, at 3.) … The two Courts of Appeals to address the 10 |/statutory question that would likely arise disagreed about how to interpret the issue. 11 || Compare Castanion-Nava v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 12, 2025
This is because a Board of 23 Immigration Appeals’ opinion in “Matter of Yajure Hurtado” held that “noncitizens who 24 entered without inspection and were later apprehended in the interior are categorically 25 ineligible … .”); Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 7 □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025) (same); 8 ||see also Rodriguez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown515 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 1981
Pollock v. Koehring Co., 540 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1976), Nolan v. Greene, 383 F.2d 814 (6th Cir. 1967), Pacific Greyhound Lines v. … Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559, 564 , 212 P.2d 878 (1949).
Modified by William O. Walker and Z of San Diego, Ltd., and Cross-Appellees v. Kfc Corporation and Heublein, Inc., and Cross-Appellants, 728 F.2d 1215 (1984)Cited 6 timesPublishedZambrano-Burgos v. United States
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2021
Bowen v. … In 14 Gibbs v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2020
. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446–47 (9th 13 Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). … Nordstrom v. Ryan, 762 F.3d 903, 920 n.1 (9th Cir. 2014) 16 (quoting Wheeler v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCuyamaca Meats, Inc. v. San Diego & Imperial Counties Butchers' & Food Employers' Pension Trust Fund
638 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 26, 1986
On June 28, Local 229A filed an unfair labor practices charge against the Employers with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). … In Carter v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 24, 2020
Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 9 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 10 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th Cir. 19 2007) (quoting Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc., 285 F.3d 801, 803 n.2 (9th Cir. 2002)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna