The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 LEONEL AMILCAR GOMEZ Case No.: 3:26-cv-02330-BTM-DEB
CABRERA,
12
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
Petitioner,
13 AMENDED HABEAS PETITION
v.
14
[ECF NO. 14]
15
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of
16
the Department of Homeland Security;
17 TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney,
General, Department of Justice; TODD
18
LYONS, Acting Director, Immigration
19 and Customs Enforcement; JESUS
ROCHA, Acting Field Office Director,
20
San Diego Field Officer; JEREMY
21 CASEY, Warden at Imperial Regional
Detention Center,
22
Respondents.
23
24
25 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Leonel Amilcar Gomez Cabrera’s second
26 amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons stated below, the petition is
27 granted.
28 //
1 Gomez Cabrera, a native of Honduras, was detained at the U.S. border and removed
2 in 2008. (ECF No. 8 (“Am. Pet.”), at 2.) In 2019, Gomez Cabrera returned to the United
3 States in order to flee political persecution in Honduras. (ECF No. 19-1 (“Second Am.
4 Pet.”), at 2.) In January 2025, he was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs
5 Enforcement (“ICE”), his prior removal order was reinstated, he was detained under 8
6 U.S.C. § 1231(a), and an Immigration Judge referred him to withholding-only proceedings.
7 (Id.) Gomez Cabrera applied for asylum but his application was denied by an Immigration
8 Judge in June 2025. (Id.) He appealed the denial of his asylum application to the Board
9 of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s decision in
10 February 2026. (Am. Pet. at 4.) Gomez Cabrera appealed the BIA’s decision to the Ninth
11 Circuit, where it is currently pending. See Gomez Cabrera v. Blanche, United States Court
12 of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 26-948. The Ninth Circuit has issued a stay of
13 removal.
14 Gomez Cabrera filed a petition for the writ of habeas corpus on April 13, 2026 (ECF
15 No. 1 (“Pet.”).) In his Second Amended Petition, Gomez Cabrera requests a bond hearing
16 based on prolonged detention. Gomez Cabrera is currently detained at the Imperial
17 Regional Detention Facility where he has been in custody for approximately eighteen
18 months.
19 Gomez Cabrara claims the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits
20 unreasonably prolonged immigration detention without a bond hearing (Second Am. Pet.
21 at 14.) The parties appear to agree that Gomez Cabrera is detained under 8 U.S.C.
22 § 1231(a) and currently in withholding-only proceedings. The Respondents also concede
23 that given the length of detention, they do not oppose this Court ordering that Gomez
24 Cabrera receive an individualized bond hearing before an Immigration Judge.
25 Due to the length of Gomez Cabrera’s detention and the Respondents’ non-
26 opposition, on or before August 20, 2026, unless Gomez Cabrera requests a continuance,
27 the Respondents are ordered to grant Gomez Cabrera an individualized bond hearing before
28 a fair, neutral, and open-minded Immigration Judge. The Immigration Judge shall consider
1 ||where Gomez Cabrera will reside, who any surety may be, the appropriateness of non-
2 ||financial conditions, the nine factors for an Immigration Judge to consider in an
3 || individualized bond hearing as set forth in Martinez v. Clark, 124 F.4th 775 (9th Cir. 2024):
4 ||(1) whether the alien has a fixed address in the United States; (2) the alien’s length of
5 residence in the United States; (3) the alien’s family ties in the United States, and whether
6 may entitle the alien to reside permanently in the United States in the future; (4) the
7 alien’s employment history; (5) the alien’s record of appearance in court; (6) the alien’s
8 ||criminal record, including the extensiveness of criminal activity, the recency of such
9 activity, and the seriousness of the offenses; (7) the alien’s history of immigration
10 violations; (8) any attempts by the alien to flee prosecution or otherwise escape from
11 || authorities; and (9) the alien’s manner of entry to the United States, and any other factors
12 ||the Immigration Judge deems relevant in this particular case. See also Matter of Guerra,
13 I&N Dec. 37, 40 (BIA 2006).
14 If the Immigration Judge denies bond, the judge must make specific findings as to
15 Gomez Cabrera is a danger to the community or a flight risk, and the Respondents
16 make the audio of the hearing available to Gomez Cabrera’s counsel. If the
17 || Respondents fail to comply with this writ, Gomez Cabrera can apply to this Court for relief.
18 For the reasons stated, the second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus is
19 || GRANTED. The Respondents are ordered to grant Gomez Cabrera an individualized
20 || bond hearing before a fair, neutral, and open-minded Immigration Judge in accordance
21 || with the requirements ordered above.
22 The parties shall file a joint statement as to compliance with this writ and order and
23 || the result of the bonding hearing by 5 p.m. on August 21, 2026. The Court retains
24 || jurisdiction to enforce the writ.
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 Dated: August 5, 2026 _ ‘
27 Honoris Barry Ted Hehe
28 United States District Judge