Case law

United States v. Auerbach

68 F. Supp. 776 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 4, 1946

Lang v. United States, 7 Cir., 133 F. 201 , gave consideration to it in connection with an immigration law which had a special savings provision. In the case of United States v. … Then in the case of Great Northern Railway Company v.

Straube v. Chertoff

560 F. Supp. 2d 983 · District Court, S.D. California · May 14, 2008

On January 13, 2005, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denied Petitioner’s appeal as untimely. On February 3, 2005, Petitioner filed a timely appeal in the Ninth Circuit. (See Straube v. … See Lema v.

United States v. National City Lines, Inc.

7 F.R.D. 393 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 14, 1947

See, Semel v. United States, 5 Cir., 1946, 158 F.2d 229, 231 . Rule 21(b), Federal Buies of Criminal Procedure. Wells Fargo & Co. v. McCarthy, 1907, 5 Cal.App. 301, 318 , 90 P. 203 ; People v. … Hyde v. Shine, 1905, 189 U.S. 62, 78 , 25 S.Ct. 760 , 50 L.Ed. 90 . In Kiley v.

In re Riccobono

140 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 18, 1956

Harrison v. Chamberlin, 271 U.S. 191 , 46 S.Ct. 467 , 70 L.Ed. 897 , quoting Board of Education v. Leary, 8 Cir., 236 F. 521, 525 ; In re Quan Weing et al., 2 Cir., 104 F.2d 112 . … Cline v. Kaplan, 1944, 323 U.S. 97, 98 , 65 S.Ct. 155 , 89 L.Ed. 97 ; Chandler v.

United States v. General Motors Corporation

234 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 24, 1964

If Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 , means what it says, the test enunciated therein certainly applies in this case. … The government relies upon United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., 362 U.S. 29 , 80 S.Ct. 503 , 4 L.Ed.2d 505 , but that case is wholly different from the case at bar.

In Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.

24 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 18, 1938

Co. v. … Sneath v.

Ellis v. Western Airlines, Inc.

652 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 22, 1986

[Quoting Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 244 , 97 S.Ct. 1782, 1804 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977)]. Id. … Ellis v. BRAC, 466 U.S. at 438 , 104 S.Ct. at 1887 .

Cowan v. San Diego Sheriff's Department

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2022

Compl. at 3; (Board of County Com’rs of Bryan County, 17 Okl. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997) (“[I]t is not enough for a § 1983 plaintiff merely 18 to identify conduct properly attributable to the municipality . . .

Larose

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 15, 2025

This is because a Board of Immigration Appeals’ opinion in “Matter of 24 Yajure Hurtado” “affirm[ed] the government’s new interpretation of § 1225” to apply to 25 individuals in her circumstances. (ECF 1, at 5.) … See, e.g., Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-02304 CAS (BFM), 6 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal.

Harper v. Poway Unified School District

545 F. Supp. 2d 1072 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 11, 2008

Plaintiff’s Facial Challenges The Poway Unified School District Board, in 1997, promulgated Board Policy, Article 5.0, Section 5.28.1, which defines hate behavior as follows: In order to foster a supportive environment for … Defts’ Opp. at 14-15 (citing, inter alia, Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v.

Runyon v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 6, 2025

See Stanz v. Brown, No. 3:22-CV-01164-GPC-JLB, 2024 WL 4267191, at *1 n.1 (S.D. Cal. 27 Sept. 23, 2024); Suarez v. … Jan. 28 10, 2023); see also Radcliffe v.

Brinkley ex rel. Herself v. Monterey Fin. Servs., LLC

340 F. Supp. 3d 1036 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 13, 2018

See Schrader v. … April 28, 2015) ; Montantes v. Inventure Foods , 2014 WL 3305578 , at *2-4 (C.D. Cal. July 2, 2014) ; Ades v. Omni Hotels Management Corporation , 46 F.Supp.3d 999 , 1017-1018 (C.D. Cal. 2014) ; Brown v. Defender Sec.

Diego-Mateo

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 3, 2025

Nadarajah v. Gonzales, 24 443 F.3d 1069, 1076 (9th Cir. 2006), abrogated on other grounds by Jennings v. Rodriguez, 25 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018); Alvarez v. Sessions, 338 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1048–49 (N.D. … Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976, 988 (9th Cir. 2017) 22 (quoting Laing v.

Simmons v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC

872 F. Supp. 2d 1002 · District Court, S.D. California · May 24, 2012

Armendariz v. … See Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 168 Cal.App.4th 938, 957 , 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 817 (2008); see generally Johannsen v. Morgan Stanley Credit Corp., Case No. 2:11-cv-01516-MCE-KJN, 2012 WL 90408 at *4 *1018 (E.D.Cal.

WTW Enters., LLC v. Marine Grp. Boat Works, LLC

369 F. Supp. 3d 1039 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 4, 2019

Co. of Am. v. Sw. Marine , 194 F.3d 1009 , 1015 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Su v. M/V S. Aster , 978 F.2d 462 , 472 (9th Cir. 1992) ). B. … (quoting Kearl v. Board of Med. Quality Assurance , 189 Cal. App. 3d 1040 , 1052, 236 Cal.Rptr. 526 (1986) ).

Al Khafati v. Covello

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 2020

Ashcroft v. … See Lee v.

Newton v. Eatmon

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 2019

Although it’s 1 || true there is no need to exhaust administrative remedies where prison officials make the 2 || grievance process “effectively unavailable,” Nunez v. … See Brown v.

Jones v. Montgomery

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 3, 2022

Ramirez, 334 F.3d at 860. 21 Jones alleges that Garcia issued a false RVR in 2020 because Jones was “due to 22 appear” in a parole board suitability hearing two years later in 2022. … See Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678; Ramirez, 334 F.3d at 860 (citations omitted); see also 6 Brown v. Oregon Dep’t of Corr., 751 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2014).

Doe v. Bondi

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2025

On April 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a 22 Petition for Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, requesting 23 the Court to compel the Board of Immigration Appeals to adjudicate her pending motion 24 … See 5 || Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir.1999). “To proceed in forma pauperis is 6 privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d 114, 116 (9th Cir.1965).

Wong v. Aetna Life Insurance

51 F. Supp. 3d 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 25, 2014

Kenneth Kopacz, M.D., board-certified in orthopedic surgery, reviewed Wong’s file. (AR 1514-17.) Dr. … Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co., 458 F.3d 955, 965 (9th Cir.2006) (citing Tremain v. Bell Indus., Inc., 196 F.3d 970 , 976 (9th Cir.1999)).