Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.23s

  • Floyd v. ELCO Administrative Services Company

    District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 2025

    See generally Carter v. … Theis Rsch., 13 Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 663–665 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting a split among the circuits on 14 this issue); Kristen M.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • GS Holistic, LLC v. Abbasi

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 18, 2024

    See 11 Mason v. Genisco Tech. … Ltd. v. Tong Soo Chung, 725 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kokal v. Massanari

    163 F. Supp. 2d 1122 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2001

    See Holohan v. … See Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir.1983).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Strickland v. O'Malley

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2025

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 6 Treichler v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090, 1102 (9th Cir. 2014). … Brown-Hunter, 8 806 F.3d at 494; see also id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 2022

    Microsoft Corp. v. TiVo 11 Inc., No. 10-CV-00240-LHK, 2011 WL 1748428, at *3 (N.D. Cal. May 6, 2011); Ethicon, Inc. v. 12 Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426–27 (Fed. Cir. 1988). … .”); see also 6 || Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., 139 F.Supp.3d 1032, 1037 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MaxPower Semiconductor, Inc. v. Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2021

    Rohm nonetheless continues to pursue invalidation of MaxPower’s patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). … See, e.g., Circuit City Stores, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Soucek v. Roblox Corporation

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2024

    Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 214 (Cal. 2021) (quoting Lugtu v. California Highway Patrol, 26 Cal. 4th 703, 716 (Cal. 2001)). … Kyablue v. Watkins, 210 Cal. App. 4th 1288, 1292 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) (quoting Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp., 63 Cal. 2d 199, 218-19 (Cal. 1965)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Consol. Pretrial Proceedings in Air West

    436 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1977

    E. g., Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners, 1 Cal.3d 351, 356-62 , 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 (1969). … Air West Incorporated, et al.; C-74-2475 AJZ, Beecher, et al. v. Lummis, et al.; C-75-0945 AJZ, Silverstein, et al. v. Lummis, et al.; C-75-1681 AJZ, Lanier, et al. v. Lummis, et al.; C-74-2444 AJZ, Sipiora v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Faizi v. Temori

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 2022

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … Clegg v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. City and County of San Francisco

    23 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 1938

    Ruddy v. … In re Sachs, D.C.1929, 31 F.2d 799 ; Ferry & Co. v. Hall, 1914, 188 Ala. 178 , 66 So. 104 , L.R.A.1917B, 620; Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. Brown, 6 Cir., 1908, 163 F. 162 ; Peoria Mfg. Co. v.

    Reversed by City & County of San Francisco v. United States, 106 F.2d 569 (1939)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McCright v. Davis

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2020

    In Connor v. … See Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991); 26 see also Langford v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lynch v. Matterport, Inc

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2022

    Stemmelin v. … Servs., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hofmann v. City & County of San Francisco

    870 F. Supp. 2d 799 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 2012

    However, section 4.100 of the San Francisco City Charter states that “the executive branch of the City and County shall be composed of departments, appointive boards, commissions and other units of government.” … See Schiff v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West v. Santa Rosa Community Health Centers

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2022

    The parties met for an Adjustment Board meeting 15 on March 25, 2019 and SRCHC again denied the grievance. (Id. at ¶ 9.) … AT & T Techs., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Co.

    469 F. Supp. 2d 803 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 2007

    Steel Co. v. … Lujan v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Trusted Knight Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2021

    O2 Micro Int’l, Ltd. v. Monolithic 11 Power Sys., Inc., 467 F.3d 1355, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2006). … Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Ltd, No. 12-cv- 23 0630-LHK (PSG), 2013 WL 3246094, at *1 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sarmiento v. Marquez

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 2022

    Menotti v. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 7 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Rather, the plaintiff must “demonstrate that, through its deliberate 8 conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ behind the injury alleged.” Id. at 404.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robinson v. City of San Jose

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2021

    Galen v. … Board of Comm’rs of Bryan County. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re JDS Uniphase Corp. Securities Litigation

    238 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2002

    (quoting EEOC v. United States Steel, 671 F.Supp. 351, 357 (E.D.Pa.1987)). … McGrane v. The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., 822 F.Supp. 1044, 1052 (S.D.N.Y.1993).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Pinterest, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 2021

    Defendant is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual 21 image boards or “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶¶ 2, 23. … Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana 11 v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.