Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.68s

  • Doe v. White

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 24, 2020

    Lopez v. … Board of 12 Regents of the State of Florida that “exhaustion of state administrative remedies should not be 13 required as a prerequisite to bringing an action pursuant to § 1983.” Patsy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rockwell International Corp. v. SDL, Inc.

    103 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 29, 2000

    See, e.g., Wanlass v. … In Wanlass v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shatswell v. Taylor

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 14, 2020

    See Balistreri v. … Brown, 19 2019 WL 359418, at *2 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LAURIE Q. v. Contra Costa County

    304 F. Supp. 2d 1185 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2004

    Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 126 F.3d 1118, 1123 (9th Cir.1997) (citing American Tunaboat Ass’n v. Brown, 67 F.3d 1404, 1407 (9th Cir.1995)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Litvinova

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2026

    Curtis v. … Campos v. Green Diamond Res. 14 Co., 785 F. Supp. 3d 589, 599 (N.D. Cal. 2025) (quoting Brown v. Brotman Med. Ctr., Inc., 571 F. 15 App’x 572, 575 (9th Cir. 2014)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martinez v. Gitova

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 2020

    See Balistreri v. … of Regents v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • J.C. v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2021

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). “An ALJ’s disability 15 determination should be upheld unless it contains legal error or is not supported by substantial 16 evidence.” Garrison v. … See, e.g., A.S. v. Saul, 2021 WL 14 1087473, at *21 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2021) (remand for consideration of whether medical evidence 15 of record supports ALJ’s DAA materiality analysis); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ingram v. Taniguchi

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 2022

    Ashcroft v. … Clegg v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Conant v. McCaffrey

    172 F.R.D. 681 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 1997

    See Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Board of Oil & Gas Conservation of Mont., 792 F.2d 782, 789 (9th Cir.1986). … See NAACP v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Heim

    130 F.R.D. 430 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 1990

    HEMISPHERE was a licensor of EOR technologies and at various times relevant to this lawsuit HEIM served as either president and/or chairman of the board of directors of HEMISPHERE. … Haynes v. Kleinewefers 119 F.R.D. 335 (E.D.N.Y. 1988).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fields v. United States

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 2020

    Ruviwat v. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 1990), overruled on other 2 grounds, Reno v. Koray, 515 U.S. 50, 54–55 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2025

    The SPA provided that Onsa’s board would be “initially comprised” of Bayston as Onsa’s 8 sole board member. SPA § 9.5; see TAC ¶ 4. … McDowell v. 1 omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ross v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 6, 2023

    See Tackett v. … See Osenbrock v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of Michigan v. DeVos

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2020

    Bus. v. … (quoting FDA v. Brown & 15 Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159 (2000)). When those circumstances are in 16 evidence, the courts will defer to the agency’s interpretation of the statute.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Loucks v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2020

    Hayakawa, 682 F.2d 1344, 1350 (9th Cir. 1982)) (”The Board of 3 Trustees is an arm of the state of California and thus the Board of Trustees may invoke the 4 Eleventh Amendment immunity.”); Herbert, 2009 WL 691067, … .”); Mitchell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • P2I LTD. v. FAVORED TECH USA CORPORATION, et al.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 12, 2026

    Trujillo v. Orozco, No. 17-CV-00566-EJD, 2018 25 WL 1142311, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2018); see also United Steelworkers of Am. v. … See Brown v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492, 497 (9th Cir. 1990); see also Camacho v. 7 Bridgeport Fin., Inc., 523 F.3d 973, 981 (9th Cir. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Late Fee and Over-Limit Fee Litigation

    528 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 16, 2007

    *956 ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … See United States v. Carolene Prods.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. S Cue Transportation LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2025

    Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operation, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) 13 (cleaned up). … See Boschetto v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Raina M. Cardoni

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 2023

    Bernhardt v. Cnty. of 3 Los Angeles, 279 F.3d 862, 871 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Trump v. Twitter Inc., No. 21-cv-08378- 4 JD, 2023 WL 1997921, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023). … If the motion is rejected, Cardoni and 3 17 others will have to go back to the drawing board to figure out what to do with the subject property. 18 In either event, the sale order that this Court is being asked

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marshall

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2026

    Knievel v. … Lucas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.