Case law

Dialect, LLC v. Google LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2024

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) is expected to make 2 institution decisions for the ‘738, ‘160, ‘006, ‘607, and ‘652 patents by October 16, 2024, and for 3 the ‘720 patent by October 25, 2024. (Dkt. … Anza Tech., Inc. v. Toshiba Am.

HIGH SIERRA HIKERS ASS'N v. Moore

561 F. Supp. 2d 1107 · District Court, N.D. California · May 8, 2008

Thomas v. Peterson, 753 F.2d 754, 764 (9th Cir.1985). … Brown, 386 F.Supp.2d 1281, 1291-92 (S.D.Fla.2005) (ordering injunctive relief pending completion of remand or further order of the court).

Hernandez v. Contra Costa County

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2021

Tech-Bilt, Inc. 19 v. Woodward-Clyde & Assocs., 38 Cal. 3d 488, 498 (1985). … City of Grand 5 Terrace v. Superior Ct., 192 Cal. App. 3d 1251, 1261 (Ct. App. 1987); see PAG-Daly City, LLC v. 6 Quality Auto Locators, Inc., No. 12-cv-3907-WHA, 2014 WL 807415, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Tucker v. Berryhill

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 2019

Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983). 7 Here, the ALJ evaluated Plaintiff’s application for benefits under the required five-step 8 sequential evaluation. AR at 33-42. … Gomez v.

Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc.

164 F. Supp. 2d 1142 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 2001

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Co. v.

Lemmon v. Santa Cruz County, Cal.

686 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1988

See Peel v. … Adams v. Mobile County Personnel Board, 95 Lab.Cas. (CCH) Para. 13,886 (S.D.Ala.1982) [available on WESTLAW, 1982 WL 1972 ]. (As to the necessity of prior notice, none is required____), Fortenberry v.

Sota

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 2025

Farmer v. … Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (California 9 Department of Corrections entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).

Brill v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. … v.

Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 12, 2020

See Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 9 2015) (internal quotation, citation, and alteration omitted). … Molina v.

Mendez v. California Teachers Association

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 16, 2020

Vance v. Peters, 97 F.3d 987, 991 (9th Cir. 23 1996); see also Taylor v. … Employee requests to cancel or change authorizations for payroll deductions for employee organizations shall be 27 directed to the employee organization rather than to the governing board.

Gutierrez v. Holder

6 F. Supp. 3d 1035 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 2014

Barnhart v. … Hosh v.

In Re Mosaic LLM Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 26, 2025

See Apple v. … Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc., 23-cv-03223 (N.D. Cal.

Adeeb

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 2026

Karim-Panahi v. … See Graham v.

Bhangal v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2024

Fund v. … Further, the agreement stated it was made “pursuant to authority granted by 8 the Board of Directors of [the parent company].” Id. And in City of Roseville Employees’ 9 Retirement System. v.

Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. Royal Plush Toys, Inc.

907 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2012

ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … .”); Perfect 10, Inc. v.

Ellawendy v. Monterey County Superior Court

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 2020

See United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir. 1984) 27 (presentence time credit claim); Brown v. … Id.; Lambert v. Blodgett, 393 F.3d 943, 979 (9th Cir. 2004); United States 17 v.

D. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2024

Evoke created a 14 treatment plan for A.D., employed a board-certified psychiatrist, maintained a supervised group 15 living arrangement, and provided necessary therapeutic interventions. … See Stone v. UnitedHealthcare Ins.

Rosas v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). “An ALJ’s disability 17 determination should be upheld unless it contains legal error or is not supported by substantial 18 evidence.” Garrison v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. The Court is “constrained to 8 review the reasons the ALJ asserts.” Id. (simplified). 9 V.

In Re Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation

692 F. Supp. 2d 1181 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 2010

Zueco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp., 552 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir.2009). … Cooper v.

Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2025

The SPA provided that Onsa’s board would be “initially comprised” of Bayston as Onsa’s 8 sole board member. SPA § 9.5; see TAC ¶ 4. … McDowell v. 1 omitted).